| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,243 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
Ya that's a tuffy, au64 for sure... Oh and a nice eds VAM 5! 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Tough call. If it's circulated, it was only in someone's pocket for about ten minutes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
The reverse looks UNC, but the obverse may have some wear, hard to say, if it's circulated, it's an AU-58+.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
Yes, slightly circulated.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2373 Posts |
MS62/63. Talons and leg feathers look great.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6394 Posts |
Definite light circulation, as indicated by the slight dull gray color below Liberty's eye and above and below IGWT on the reverse. I see the contact marks on the left wing but don't think they are severe enough to qualify as a problem for a grading service. Breast feathers are well-defined and there is a lot of luster evident. Minor nicks on Liberty's cheek are not a big deal for an AU coin.
I'd say strong for AU-55 and AU-58 is not out of the question. Pretty much the poster child for a "slider" IMO. Still a perfectly nice CC Morgan!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
AU Details The tip of the wing looks damaged.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
This is a TOUGH morgan to grade, in all honesty, you might get ms 60.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
Low MS. Too much luster, clean fields and lack of contact marks on devices for me to go AU. Is that a scan?
Edited by edweather 06/11/2015 6:10 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1584 Posts |
No scan, just my usual sub-par photos.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
There are several areas exhibiting some light circulation. I agree with your assessment. Nice AU58
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36832 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Yes, this is a slider.  I don't see anything which rises to the level of "damage," though. As for me I'm coming down on the AU58 side of "slider" but like all sliders I'd be ready to call it Mint State in-hand. The mint mark orientation only seems to match VAM-5, but the date is a bit too wide right for that one. Interesting.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,243 |
Page 2 of 2
|