Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1967 1 Cent Double Struck?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 28 / Views: 4,818Next Topic Page 2 of 2
Pillar of the Community
Canada
693 Posts
 Posted 07/06/2015  11:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Scissel to your friends list

Quote:
why is the legend so perfectly preserved, and not the beads?


Maybe the first strike was done at a low pressure, such as in a die set-up strike? That would explain the weakness in the beads. If both strikes were done at a low pressure, that might be why the coin is so flat - without the usual distortion from the second strike.

The coin does appear to have genuine damage from being stuck in a coin counting machine. Often error coins are discovered this way. This adds a hint of credibility to it being authentic, or at least it having seen some circulation.
Moderator
Learn More...
Canada
10460 Posts
 Posted 07/06/2015  11:27 pm  Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list
The fact that it appears to have a second strike off-centre pretty much tells me everything...

A bronze penny is pretty soft... even with a weak strike, it should flatten the rim to the same elevation of the fields (which is the highest point on the die)... you should be able to trace exactly where the edge of the die is for an off-centre strike, even on a weak second strike...
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1330 Posts
 Posted 07/07/2015  8:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add eddio to your friends list
nice coin I liked even if it does not look like the one spp posted.dont be too quick to get ready it..
Pillar of the Community
Canada
870 Posts
 Posted 07/07/2015  11:26 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add robmck1967 to your friends list
I still like it too. I am going to take more detailed pictures and post them to see if we can figure this one out. I think the second strike (false/soft die strike) of the queen has amazingly good detail. I am impressed with whomever faked this coin...if that is what happened.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
870 Posts
 Posted 07/08/2015  11:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add robmck1967 to your friends list
I took some extra pictures to show more of the details of the coin in question.

This shot shows how much of a larger diameter the coin has.


1967-1-Cent-Double-Struck?


These 3 shots show the railroad like rim and the somewhat flattened rim area on the obverse and reverse



1967-1-Cent-Double-Struck?

1967-1-Cent-Double-Struck?

1967-1-Cent-Double-Struck?


And some closer pics of the key areas on the reverse and obverse. Please note that the coin is warped very similar to an off center or broadstruck coin can be. You can see it between the 2 strikes of DG Regina.



1967-1-Cent-Double-Struck?

1967-1-Cent-Double-Struck?

1967-1-Cent-Double-Struck?

1967-1-Cent-Double-Struck?

1967-1-Cent-Double-Struck?

1967-1-Cent-Double-Struck?



I am not trying to push that it is real but just showing some of the other details not present in my first pics. I don't want to dismiss it and return the coin without being certain. All opinions are welcome on this. Thanks a lot! Rob

Pillar of the Community
Canada
2301 Posts
 Posted 07/08/2015  3:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsguy to your friends list
I am leaning to legit. Coin in hand would be required for positive response/negative response.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts
 Posted 07/08/2015  3:17 pm  Show Profile   Check thedollarman's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add thedollarman to your friends list
try to find die markers that match for the first and second strike....this will help cause both strikes would occur from the same die.
Feel free to call me Will.
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts
 Posted 07/08/2015  4:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kbbpll to your friends list
I don't know anything about these kinds of errors, but doesn't that "railroad" rim indicate that the coin was struck 4 times? I might be imagining things, but I think I see 4 different sets of beads on the reverse in the first set of photos. Are those beads directly above "CENT" or just something about the photo? And then the more distinct beads above CENT closer to the rim seem to have two different arcs. Well anyway, I find this discussion interesting.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
870 Posts
 Posted 07/08/2015  11:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add robmck1967 to your friends list
I see what you mean, Kppbll. I will try to get better photos of the area above cent on the reverse.
Moderator
Learn More...
Canada
10460 Posts
 Posted 07/09/2015  12:35 am  Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list
I am still puzzled why the second (or last) strike on the reverse, is missing the beads on the left side of the reverse - that is the hammer die, they should be there, especially since we see them from the first strike...
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3234 Posts
 Posted 07/09/2015  2:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DEVLEC to your friends list
Thanks for adding these extra pics.

I find the 4 clear stacked rim images to be very interesting
..and an important added detail.

..but I'll let the experts try to work this out.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
870 Posts
 Posted 07/09/2015  11:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add robmck1967 to your friends list
I don't know where to go from here. I have never had a potential double or multiple struck coin in my possession before.

I wonder if Mike Diamond has checked this thread out? If you say his name out loud three times does he suddenly appear? Mike Diamond, Mike Diamond, Mike Diamond. Lol
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2632 Posts
 Posted 07/09/2015  11:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Alexer to your friends list
What about struck twice both times partially out of collar, creating a double railroad rim effect? Coin may have been on a slight angle in collar causing the beads not to strike up very well on the left of the reverse and the right of the obverse.
The last picture is kind of odd it nearly looks like 3 strikes.

Well thats my guess until we hear from more of the experts.
Pillar of the Community
United States
2738 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2015  11:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mikediamond to your friends list
It looks like a genuine double strike to me. The four steps on the edge suggests we might be dealing with two successive partial collar strikes. But face-on, the first strike looks to have been fully within the collar while the second strike looks like it was an uncentered broadstrike. Puzzling. The incomplete arc of beads on the reverse face is also a bit puzzling, but it doesn't unduly alarm me. Figuring out precisely what happened would take a close-up exam.
Error coin writer and researcher.
Edited by mikediamond
07/10/2015 11:20 pm
Pillar of the Community
Canada
870 Posts
 Posted 07/10/2015  11:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add robmck1967 to your friends list
Thank you Mike, Spp, nickelsguy, and all the rest that passed on opinions. I appreciate it.
Page 2 of 2   Previous TopicReplies: 28 / Views: 4,818Next Topic Page 2 of 2
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.36 seconds to rattle this change. Forums