| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 5,693 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
599 Posts |
LukeFisher This forum has given accurate grading for your coins. These exact same coins are listed on ebay and they are overgraded. EG We graded your 1930 halfpenny gVF but its listed for sale as aUNC-UNC. What is the point of grading this one ? You are only going to disregard what we say and list them as your grade anyway. Watch your top knot
|
|
New Member
 Australia
40 Posts |
@stevo how can you tell a coin like this has been cleaned if I may ask?
Edited by LukeFisher93
10/31/2015 12:00 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2624 Posts |
I would have imagined if it were cleaned they would have picked the dirt out of the 3. Tiny abrasions on the surface are what will let you know it was cleaned, but I certainly couldn't see from this photo, so I am interested to hear how it can be known too.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
When I was a kid, I cleaned coins using a rag and non abrasive metal polish.
Quite often, there was black residue left behind in the lettering. In almost all cases, almost all mint lustre is lost, except perhaps some some small areas in the legends.
This coin was worn to begin with, and appears to have suffered such treatment by some unknowing person. It has re patinated since then.
The flat dull nature of the fields as well as the worn down high areas of the design suggest this to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2624 Posts |
Thanks for that explanation sel. The worn down high area's are particularly evident on the crown but how do we know this is from polishing rather than from circulation? I mean surely the luster can be lost from many fingers as well as cloth? (I am playing devils advocate here)
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
You are right; lustre can be lost from either polishing or wear.
I have seen almost all lustre lost from non abrasive metal polish on a freshly minted coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
599 Posts |
Watch your top knot
Edited by echidna
11/01/2015 08:57 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
7096 Posts |
Quote:
Wow its EF
And it hasnt been cleaned ! That is a bit concerning, especially when the consensus here was F cleaned. If this coin sells expect it to be returned for a refund and also expect some neg feedback. |
|
Valued Member
Australia
56 Posts |
its a shame there are so many dodgy people out there, hopefully some newbie doesn't get burnt with one of these
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
908 Posts |
Quote:
@stevo how can you tell a coin like this has been cleaned if I may ask? It is relatively dirt free and has no patina.A coin that is 100+ years old would collect all sorts of grime and dirt considering it is very well circulated so should have a dirty look about it |
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
539 Posts |
he has given a clear not as described return reason with his description "I would grade this coin EF. 6 Pearls + Full Diamond"
clearly no diamond on this coin
having said this I think this account is a clear fraudster with the fake 1938 crown and 34/35 florin he has for sale
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
599 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
145 Posts |
Sorry for being to honest. But really its a piece of junk.
|
|
Formerly nancyc
Australia
5385 Posts |
A bit pointless as this thread is nearly 2 yrs old.  life is a mystery to be lived not a problem to be solved
|
|
Valued Member
269 Posts |
It is not pointless, it's an example of a date popular with collectors and worth thousands in UNC.
That coin is definitely [and obviously]cleaned and nowhere near EF.
The original aVF assessment is correct.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 5,693 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 10/30/2015 11:58 pm
