| Author |
Replies: 35 / Views: 5,123 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
256 Posts |
Slq.....no question. Not to start a fight but I personally find Washington quarters boring. Actually slq may even be my favorite design or at least right up there.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1153 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
927 Posts |
SLQ definitely. It's way past time to get all of the dead presidents off the coins. And I mean no disrespect to any past president. I just think the Liberty designs are way better.
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
208 Posts |
I believe the Standing Liberty would win a poll handily. I like Washington quarters better though! Just love getting them in AU or even MS when I buy 90% silver. Or EF S mints from the 40's etc. Classic design, people take it for granted because it is so familiar. Also all but 2 coins in the set are pretty easy, and the last 2 aren't too difficult. The 1916 SLQ is very tough. I actually think the SLQ design is overrated. Liberty's body is usually worn completely flat, resulting in an ugly coin, whereas the profile on Washingtons holds up better, and the date on SLQ's can wear off, like the Buffalo nickel. And for MS SLQ's, there is lot of debate over whether is a really Full Head or not, even for certified coins.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
As a boy in the sixties I liked collecting Washington quarters. There were many dates to find, yet the collection was relatively easy to fill. There was also something unique about the way a mintmark jumped out during inspection that was exciting. This helped fuel my love for coin collecting. In contrast, the SLQs were rarer in circulation, often with unreadable dates and with many hyper-rare. This was frustrating so starting a collection seemed futile. At the time I didn't appreciate the virtues of miss Liberty, and now I'll admit the design (other than the wear problem) and beauty of a high-grade SLQ specimen is far superior to a Washington. But I also maintain she's not standing, she's descending!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
613 Posts |
All respect to Mr. W, but can always go for a classical design like the SLQ!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5029 Posts |
I am a fan of the slq because it is a very nice artistic piece in my opinion.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
SLQ great classic coin. But hard to put a set together, even harder in UNC. Washington quarter was only supposed to be a one year commemorative coin. People in 1932 liked it so much it was decided to keep it as a permanent replacement for the SLQ. What's not to like about the Washington quarter. 1932 - 1964 90% silver 1992 to date has 90% silver proof State and territory quarters America the beautiful ( national parks ) I would vote Washington
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5672 Posts |
The SLQ, hands down. Both obv and rev are beautiful designs. I find the presidential portraits of the late 20th century not very aesthetically appealing.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10038 Posts |
SLQ - BUT - I like the REV eagle design on the Washington aslo.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4078 Posts |
As John said, Quote: SLQ,all day every day John1 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
371 Posts |
SLQ's are my all time favorite and the one that got me into collecting. When I was 12 I got a low end metal detector for my birthday and shortly after that found a dateless SLQ in our front yard. That coin struck me as I had never seen one of them or any coin that was out of circulation before.
|
|
New Member
United States
20 Posts |
Standing Liberty Quarter. Really like that style of coin design.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
422 Posts |
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 35 / Views: 5,123 |
Page 3 of 3
|