| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,033 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
It is a RPM, but so far I can't identify it yet.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
Nice find! Looks like less hand shake on the last photos.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
125 Posts |
The x30 loupe photos turned out better in my opinion than the x60. Guess it gets too pix-elated when re-sizing images at higher magnification.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1602 Posts |
Quote: The x30 loupe photos turned out better in my opinion than the x60 Yes, but it was on one of the first pictures that you could most clearly see the notching.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
125 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2824 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
125 Posts |
Looks like RPM #72 to me actually.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
My listings only go to 1943-P RPM-061.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
125 Posts |
Was referring to OcalaFlorida's links. Shows up to #72
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2824 Posts |
Edited by OcalaFlorida 03/12/2016 8:49 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
The biggest problem is that the two images are not the same location for the mint marks.  Cleatis87 coin is further north.
Edited by coop 03/12/2016 10:01 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
265 Posts |
Sweet War Nickel, I'm goin through all mine again. Just to make sure. Did you find this in circulation, Cleatus? All my wild finds except 2 or 3 are in horrible condition.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
125 Posts |
I search the internet (mostly ebay) for high grade coins that are not attributed. So I guess that is my version of searching through "circulation"
|
|
Valued Member
United States
80 Posts |
On the last photo of the third set of pictures you posted, it looks to me on the top right (bottom of P) that the mint mark has been triple struck.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
125 Posts |
Debating on sending coin in to John Wexler & crew for attribution. I am unsure how to call this one based on existing varieties.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,033 |
Page 2 of 2
|