| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 6,850 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21663 Posts |
I voted fake for the following reasons. Compare with genuine coin on left. Upper lip protruds on genuine, does not on fake. End of ribbon different on both coins. Tail of "Q" on genuine touches inside of letter, on fake it does not. There are other minor differences on both Obverse and Reverse but these should be convincing enough.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
There is some reasonable die marker knowledge for you, that I couldn't provide !
We are all programed from birth to recognize faces, and the ability increases as we develop after birth. It is that ability that enables to recognize faces in a crowd.
That skill can also be put to good use in identifying minor differences with human faces and profiles on coins.
It all helps, on this occasion, leading us to 'fake'.
Edited by sel_69l
05/14/2018 7:22 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Unfortunately, the lack of details are an instant concern.
There are a LOT of these fakes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1666 Posts |
A lot of these coins are damaged on purpose to take away suspicion. They sell for less than a problem free coin, but still for a lot more than the fake is worth.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Hong Kong
1270 Posts |
Actually it is a high grade numismatic forgery to me.
RealOrFake, would you post a lot of edge pictures for teaching purpose? May I have the weight and diameter of the coins?
|
|
New Member
 South Africa
3 Posts |
Thanks for the help and the welcome. Those comparison images convinced me it's a fake. It weighs 27.0 grams on my 1-decimal scale. Diameter is about 38mm. I couldn't get my camera to focus on the rim, but here are two photos:   Edited by RealOrFake
05/15/2018 04:15 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
3831 Posts |
I'll be honest - if that was offered to me, I would have bought it as a damaged example to fill a hole in my collection. Wow. This is one of my poorer example - I don't know if I should doubt it  I'm looking for a damaged example of 1866 half dollar but it looks like I better be skeptical... |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21663 Posts |
Pretty beat up but looks genuine.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
414 Posts |
I agree, the OPs coin is a forgery. I didn't need to examine the details Jimmy provided in his excellent comparison post. The mushy uneven dentils were enough for me to indicate this is a not a struck coin.
The weight may be good and the diameter may be good but I'd bet the thickness is NOT! Do measure the thickness (if you have a caliper) and let us know what you find. It could be picture distortion but to me it looks like that the thickness is not uniform and the coin is thicker in some parts than others.
Lastly, to determine the material, you can do an SG test.
@gxseries your specimen, though pretty bruised and worn, looks authentic to me - bigger pictures would help raise my degree of confidence.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
3831 Posts |
cableguy - not the best photos but here they are:   Still collectable in my book as long as it's genuine. My partial coin collection http://www.omnicoin.com/collection/gxseriesMy numismatics articles and collection: http://www.gxseries.com/numis/numis_index.htmRegularly updated at least once a month. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Hong Kong
1270 Posts |
Real coin, very good oriental design!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
414 Posts |
I agree with Henry, I do believe your coin to be genuine.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
3831 Posts |
Thanks guys! That said, any idea of where I can find a low grade / damaged piece of 1866 half dollar? It's the last hole in my type set. Been looking for it for a while.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
414 Posts |
These are pretty scarce and very pricey. This example (VF Details - Excessive Surface Hairlines), which is pretty ugly in my view, hammered at $840. How much are you looking to spend?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
3831 Posts |
cableguy - I have no problem if it's a low grade / damaged example. I guess I'm not too keen in throwing four figure for an example. At the same time, I'm not into replicas either...
I guess I'll keep lurking. I was lucky with the rest of the HK coins - some took a fair bit of effort such as the 1866 - 1868 dollar and 1902 - 1905 20 cents.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 6,850 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 05/14/2018 7:11 pm
