| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 3,591 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189053 Posts |
The second one. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
743 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1023 Posts |
The second one. The top one isn't attractive imo.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Unanimous decision here. Show us all that grade is not always the most important determinant on the marketability, and indirectly the value.
Like everyone else, #2.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
The 1850  John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10038 Posts |
 #2 No hesitation at all.
|
|
Valued Member
240 Posts |
The 2nd one ... for the obvious reason. The 1st has splotchy coloring. However, the surfaces of the 1st coin are in better condition than the surfaces of the 2nd coin.
I wonder if the 1st coin would look better after taken through NGC's conservation process? Of course, you would have NGC regrade it afterwards. You would probably want to ask the experts here if this is a good idea. This assumes the splotchy coloring of the coin really bothers you.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Who cares how they graded, #2 is the nicer coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1448 Posts |
I dont think I ever seen unanimous agreements in all my years on ccf! Thanks everybody!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2311 Posts |
The second one is much nicer. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
i love being the outlier here by so much  ...I'd pick #1 all day. although I love the eye appeal of the second coin, it graded lower because of all the reverse scratching which absolutely kills it for me. the first piece is a technically higher grade, with more beautiful luster, while the second one is beautiful but inferior by far due to the reverse scratching which relative to the size of the coin seems pretty major. the only thing saving the second coin's eye appeal and hiding the scratches is that toning.
Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 25 / Views: 3,591 |
Page 2 of 2
|