| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 2,324 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188913 Posts |
The "D" mint mark is clearly visible on the reverse, making this a 1964. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
 I was wondering who was going to pull that!
Edited by coppercoins 11/12/2008 3:12 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
322 Posts |
Ha Ha. Very funny. Did I mention I was a noobie. It even shows it in my Red Book. And the teller said that there wasn't any silver in there. I also found a 1974 clip, and a ugly 1977 s proof from the same 4 rolls. Thanks KurtS, I like it too. Thanks, Mike
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Hi,
I was wondering how long that was going to take:-)
Have Fun, Bill:-)
Edited by foundinrolls 11/12/2008 7:50 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Hi Again, The idea here was to indicate that something can be identified by small details. There was very little left of this coin but it had to be a coin minted with a certain date and at a certain Mint. Of course the piece is a 1964 D.
Honing this attention to detail is how Chuck and I can sometimes look at a portion of a coin in a picture and without seeing the date, indicate what date the coin is.
This coin was an interesting one in that one detail was all that was needed to identify the coin as to its date and mintmark, if it was noticed.
In education, we call this the "discovery method" of teaching.
So...this was not any kind of joke intended to be funny. This was an educational experience that had a humorous aspect to it.
Detail, detail and more detail makes the study of die varieties and errors fun.
Have Fun, Bill
Edited by foundinrolls 11/12/2008 8:01 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Hi All, One last thing...this is not pulling any legs. We can determine the Date on the coin and the Mint of origin on this piece, but we can't tell when it was actually Minted. The reason for this is that 1964 dated 90% silver Kennedy half dollars were actually produced from January 1964 through April of 1966. According to the Department of the Treasury/Bureau of the Mint: "Public Law 88-580, Sept. 3, 1964 authorized the Mint to inscribe the figure 1964 on all coins minted until adequate supplies were available. The Denver Mint minted produced halves dated 1964 with the D mintmark in both 1964 and 1965. They didn't mint any 1964 D pieces in 1966. Have Fun, Bill
Edited by foundinrolls 11/12/2008 8:12 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
322 Posts |
Hi. Thanks for all the info. I'm learning so much. It's hard to keep up.
Thanks again, Mike
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Quote: The Denver Mint minted produced halves dated 1964 with the D mintmark in both 1964 and 1965. They didn't mint any 1964 D pieces in 1966. No mint marks on all 1965-1967 U.S. Coins.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Hi Coop, Just to clarify... Coins with the frozen date of 1964 were struck at Philadelphia with no mintmark until 1966. Kennedy halves were struck with a 1964 date and the D mintmark into 1965. The mint in Denver also produced dimes in 1965 and 1966 dated and mintmarked 1964-D The San Fransisco Mint even got into the act producing 1964 dated quarters in 1965 and 1966 but on those, no mintmarks were used. There were no mintmarks used at all on coins dated 1965, 1966 or 1967. The above pertains to silver issues but cents and nickels were struck dated 1964 or 1964 D later than 1964 and 200 million 1964 cents with no mintmarks were coined in San Fransisco in 1965. It's a confusing bit of coinage history. Thanks, Bill
Edited by foundinrolls 11/13/2008 9:49 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3098 Posts |
Also to answer leebreeze, A Dryer Coin or a slot machine coin is a coin that has been used continuously in these vending machines. Through years of constant everyday wear, their rims become more upset, and becomes thus like in the picture.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
That's not entirely accurate. Dryer Coins really are coins that have become stuck inside the fins of commercial dryers in laundromats all over the country. The coins are tumbled continuously while inside the fins. That beats the edges up. Coins that are used in casinos can show a similar effect but that is as a result of being used in the slot machines and as suggested, use over time in the slots will damage the edges of the coins. Often we see half dollar coins with no reeding as a result of having been used in slot machines for an extended period of time. Thanks, Bill
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3098 Posts |
oh.... Thanks for telling me! I was actually thinking why a penny would be used in ANY vending machine. Anyways, can someone post a picture of a slot machine coin? I want to see the difference 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2589 Posts |
Here's the most dramatic Dryer Coin I own. It looks like someone took a blowtorch to it. 
Edited by XavierOfGreen 11/14/2008 11:56 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Hi,
This a "casino half" as we call them. The surfaces are all dinged up with thousands of tiny nicks and the reeding is destroyed. This is as a result of having been run through and dropped out of half dollar slot machines. The edges never get turned up on these as the casino's counting machines reject them before that happens so that they don't jam up the slot machines.
It is also fair to say that many casinos do not use halves at all any more and since they are no longer in the systems of the casinos they turn up in Brinks boxes and at banks a lot more often than they used to.
Thanks, Bill
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
322 Posts |
Whenever I get halves about 40% are damaged from slot machines. Man are they ugly!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 25 / Views: 2,324 |
Page 2 of 2
|