| Author |
Replies: 34 / Views: 6,617 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
196460 Posts |
Quote: First post from me ....  to the Community!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
2646 Posts |
Yes, welcome to CCF @vb23vb & nice FDY catch! Hope to see more posts!
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
325 Posts |
I have read parts of this thread numerous times over the past few years. It contains a wealth of information for anyone interested in collecting the Journey series of banknotes. I recently had opportunity to pickup a few of the ones I am missing. First off is this 2001 BEK replacement note (printed in 2003) with the Jenkins Dodge signature. I am still looking for the regular BEK note.  Next is the 2001 Knight Dodge FEE note (printed in 2001) which had a short run of 480,000.  Lastly, I also managed to acquire a 2001 Jenkins Dodge BEP note (printed in 2003). This one might turn out to be a bit of a sleeper in terms of scarcity, even though there were 10,000,000 printed. I guess time will tell.  Thanks walk2dwater for all the great information you have provided in this thread!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
196460 Posts |
Nice examples! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
2646 Posts |
Quote: Thanks walk2dwater for all the great information you have provided in this thread! -I'm glad I could help! Great additions BTW  . Looks like your Journey set is shaping up nicely.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
325 Posts |
I was at the Calgary Coin Show this weekend and picked up a few banknotes. The first two are sequential 2001 Jenkins Dodge notes (printed in 2003) with the BEP prefix.   I also managed to snag a 2001 Knight Thiessen note (printed in 2000) with the FDY prefix. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
196460 Posts |
Quote: I was at the Calgary Coin Show this weekend and picked up a few banknotes. Nice examples! 
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
91 Posts |
Only 15 away from the one you posted before. It appears you've found the HOLY BEP connection! 
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
325 Posts |
Quote: Only 15 away from the one you posted before. Interesting. I didn't even notice that.
Edited by Canada67 03/03/2026 8:44 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
196460 Posts |
Quote:Quote: Only 15 away from the one you posted before. Interesting. I didn't even notice that. 
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
325 Posts |
Quote: Although the BoC released numbers to indicate that 5.970,000 2004 HOH prefixes were printed, most were likely returned/destroyed since collectors reported very few on the SNDB (Serial Number Data Base) hosted by the CPMF (Canadian Paper Money Forum). The highest 2004 HOH reported was HOH0187763 (& I believe my note was from a large run of the higher range). It is unlikely that all 2005 HOH were released too since mostly ranges were discovered. We often saw the replacement version along with runs so that the 2005 HOH can be tough too. However, their scarcity was eclipsed by the 2004 HOH super short run (not as advertised, much like the 2003 BER $10). I spotted a 2004 HOH prefix about a week ago and decided to snap it up. It arrived in the mail today and I am pleased with my purchase.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
2646 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
196460 Posts |
Fantastic! 
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
91 Posts |
Only 87 away from the one walk2dwater posted before. It appears you've found the knack of getting close serial numbers. 
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
325 Posts |
Quote: Nicely done @Canada67! Quote: Fantastic! Thank you! Quote: Only 87 away from the one walk2dwater posted before. It appears you've found the knack of getting close serial numbers. I noticed that the serial numbers were fairly close to each other. My note came from New Brunswick.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 34 / Views: 6,617 |
Page 3 of 3
|