| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 2,781 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Thank you. What kind of value does it hold? John1  Edited by John1
05/03/2022 5:36 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10048 Posts |
nice find  How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash? Download and read: Grading the graders Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4637 Posts |
Quote:
What kind of value does it hold? Uncirculated examples sell for approximately $25. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5839 Posts |
Learn something new everyday.
Thanks you.
|
|
Moderator
United States
15571 Posts |
Great knowledge transfer - thank you for sharing that link and your bill.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
600 Posts |
I do wonder if this should be referred to as an error or a variety. Engraving the smaller plate number for use at the FW facility was a mistake, but the note is certainly printed as made without error. Just semantics, as it doesn't change what it is, but I'm just thinking (typing) out loud.
|
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
Maybe it could be a mule? A back plate was used that was not intended. John1 |
|
Valued Member
 United States
447 Posts |
Quote:
Great knowledge transfer - thank you for sharing that link and your bill. NP anytime! |
|
Valued Member
United States
447 Posts |
Quote:
Maybe it could be a mule? A back plate was used that was not intended. I was thinking the same too. :) |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1812 Posts |
For those not aware when it comes to the series 1995 Fort Worth bp295 engraving error I noticed that on the H-E Block Run 9 ~ the right half (16 notes) of Sheet #142966 was printed with the Overprint on back error.
Of the 16 notes printed I have two of them now certified by PMG, s/n H57542966E is graded VF25 & H55942966E graded Gem 66EPQ.
With each note I made a customized census chart showing both confirmed serial numbers and the 14 serial numbers currently awaiting confirmation.
When time permits I will try to resize the pics to under 300kb.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1532 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
447 Posts |
Quote:
For those not aware when it comes to the series 1995 Fort Worth bp295 engraving error I noticed that on the H-E Block Run 9 ~ the right half (16 notes) of Sheet #142966 was printed with the Overprint on back error.
Of the 16 notes printed I have two of them now certified by PMG, s/n H57542966E is graded VF25 & H55942966E graded Gem 66EPQ.
With each note I made a customized census chart showing both confirmed serial numbers and the 14 serial numbers currently awaiting confirmation.
When time permits I will try to resize the pics to under 300kb. are you Adrian in one of the FB groups by chance? :) |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1812 Posts |
No, I did post a comment on Facebook yesterday in two group posts on this topic, my Facebook account is for numismatic related posts & username is Vernon V Peterson.
|
|
Valued Member
Netherlands
153 Posts |
Quote:
I do wonder if this should be referred to as an error or a variety. Engraving the smaller plate number for use at the FW facility was a mistake, but the note is certainly printed as made without error. Just semantics, as it doesn't change what it is, but I'm just thinking (typing) out loud. Exactly my thoughts  I believe many people are all too eager to name just about anything ERROR so it commands astronomical sums of money on ebay. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1812 Posts |
In the beginning I called the bp295 fw notes a mule back plate thinking that it was to print notes in DC, I learned afterwards the error currency books called this a engraving error!.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,781 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 05/03/2022 4:52 pm
