| Author |
 Replies: 26 / Views: 3,485 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9864 Posts |
I'm torn between MS62 RB and UNC Details
Either way it's a rare beauty, congrats!
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
632 Posts |
3 high points with a bit of evidence of rubbing (not circulation) and an old ding. MS64. Maybe a bit of discount due to the ding taking it down to 63. Colour? I don't have experience but for me it is full R.
Not my cup of tea but this is beautiful! Beautiful enough to make me post on a thread that is not about twoonies.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'm going with UNC details. But a beautiful example no doubt.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3178 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2495 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1780 Posts |
Stunning look. Those scratches and the gouge hurt it. High AU with slight wear. Nice die crack running through the ribbon and out the 8.
"We are poor little lambs...who have lost our way...Baa...Baa...Baa"
In memory of those members who left us too soon...
In memory of Tootallious March 31, 1964 - April 15, 2020
In memory of crazyb0 July 27 2020. RIP.
In memory of T-BOP Oct. 12, 1949 - Jan. 19, 2024
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
667 Posts |
I submitted it as an impaired Proof. It has the square rims and flat fields of a proof strike but it also has that ding and scratches.
The Tru-View shows more pink than the token in hand.
PCGS called it MS62RB.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1352 Posts |
I would have called it an impaired proof as well.
http://www.victoriancent.com2011 & 2025 Fred Bowman Award Winner, 2020 J. Douglas Ferguson Award Winner, & 2022 Paul Fiocca Award Winner. Life Member of RCNA.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1984 Posts |
Just out of curiosity what was your PCGSturnaround time on this? I have a submission that is now closing in on 7 months sitting in "Encapsulation" ........
|
|
Valued Member
United States
60 Posts |
If there are objective technical standards that inarguably prove it as a proof, resub for your PR grade and state your case on the form, hope they don't 'get you back' with a details grade for the scratches. They can and do screw up, even big stuff. I have an 1861 Italy coin in high mint state where they missed... the mintmark...   Edited by LandonM
06/19/2022 4:59 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1949 Posts |
Saw this one in hand, I agree with Gene on it being an impaired proof
It's a beautiful piece in hand
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1352 Posts |
It has that look.
http://www.victoriancent.com2011 & 2025 Fred Bowman Award Winner, 2020 J. Douglas Ferguson Award Winner, & 2022 Paul Fiocca Award Winner. Life Member of RCNA.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
667 Posts |
Quote:
Just out of curiosity what was your PCGSturnaround time on this? I have a submission that is now closing in on 7 months sitting in "Encapsulation" ........ It was submitted at the FUN show in January. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1984 Posts |
I guess I feel a little better. My submission is a bunch of quite tricky cross grades. Really hoping for them soon.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1081 Posts |
Same concern as @coinfrog - the dig and the odd little scratches. Those scratches don't look like what you get during a harsh cleaning...just some little misfortune from the past 185 years. Overall though, it hardly matters - I don't think I've ever seen such eye appeal on one of those. Absolutely top drawer. Congrats....jealous!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 26 / Views: 3,485 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 06/18/2022 2:03 pm
