| Author |
 Replies: 34 / Views: 2,414 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
98306 Posts |
very nice find/purchase.. I like the partial reeding....
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7174 Posts |
Looks more like a thin planchet. The edge picture looks like I can see the different layers. A Nickel plan would be struck smaller in dia than this. The lite weight difference in a thin plan would not let the planchet expand to the correct diameter, Thats why there is weak reeds. In either case, nice find.
Edited by Cujohn
12/21/2022 5:38 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
Please ALWAYS remove your coin from the 2x2 holder so we can see it better. Thanks..  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8815 Posts |
Merc, if you can't see that clearly, then you need new glasses.... Thanks.. -makecents-
Edited by -makecents-
12/21/2022 10:12 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5838 Posts |
That's very cool find, don't see it as a double strike coin but guessing the pressure from the device cause the lettering to stretch near the peripheral. Also guessing the nickel size prevent the reed from completing.
Edited by macmercury
12/21/2022 11:30 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1551 Posts |
Under magnification this piece has lateral as well as elongated artifacts. 2 sections on its edge show an overlapped reeding, types of artifacts point to a double strike. I will have this piece XRF scanned Wednesday morning during FUN set up, before it gets placed in for grading. The planchet has no copper center and scales just a hair under 5 grams just like most 1971 nickels so I am 99.9% confident it's a nickel planchet, and Brain Raines has viewed it and has it as a double strike as well.
I don't plan on selling it right now so it's just a neat piece. BTW the piece is not 100% round the cross section from 9 O clock to 3 O clock you can see where it's just not quite right.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2233 Posts |
I've heard of quarters being struck on dime planchets, but quarters on nickel planchets is a first for me. Very cool piece.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
what element of this coin can't happen from a single strike on a too small planchet?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Weight? That might help? Looks like a clad planchet.
Edited by coop
12/22/2022 11:04 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7519 Posts |
@coop, The OP has provided the weight in the beginning description: This coin scales in at 4.94 grams...........
Considering the weight I think it was struck on a nickel planchet.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2233 Posts |
The way we would know for certain is if you put it under one of those metal analysis machines some dealers have.
If it shows up as 75% Cu and 25% Ni, we know with 100% certainty it's struck on a nickel planchet. The copper content would be slightly higher if it was on a quarter planchet since the core is made of pure copper.
Edited by CalzoneManiac
12/22/2022 1:02 pm
|
|
Moderator
United States
15548 Posts |
Very interesting.  Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5838 Posts |
Another week of suspense till Wednesday...  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2740 Posts |
This quarter was certainly struck on a 5-cent blank. Whether it was struck twice is not quite as certain. The abrupt boundary between the normal-looking letters of QUARTER DOLLAR and the stretched-out letters lying just beyond them suggests two strikes with no movement of the coin between strikes. Elsewhere, we just see the normal metal flow one associates with a coin struck once out-of-collar or within a collar larger than the blank. On balance, I'd go with the double strike.
Error coin writer and researcher.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7519 Posts |
Thank you Mike D , now we know. No doubt a great error example.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 34 / Views: 2,414 |
Page 3 of 3
|
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 12/21/2022 5:36 pm
