| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,483 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
New Member
 Philippines
5 Posts |
oh the shots are outdoor, in a daylight. this is what it looks like indoor. 
|
|
Forum Dad
 United States
24161 Posts |
Still not seeing it. Looks like a BU circulation coin.
|
|
New Member
 Philippines
5 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188535 Posts |
 to the Community!
|
|
New Member
 Philippines
5 Posts |
Thank you sir. Glad to be here.
|
|
Forum Dad
 United States
24161 Posts |
Same year and date circulation coins and proof coins weight the same.
But you weren't talking about weight, you said all the coins in your original post are proofs. I'm saying none of them are.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
25229 Posts |
 These are not proof coins.
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
|
New Member
 Philippines
5 Posts |
yes sir. I said its proof, but you said its Bu circulation so I'm asking back if Bu circulation weigh 2.8grams? I must confess that I'm bad at taking a photos, so I took your opinion that its a Bu circulation. Now, I'm asking does Bu circulation weigh 2.8grams? What is this really mean is, you made an assessment base on what you see on the photos base on your opinion, is it really all that easy, there are alot of things needed to make an assessment. yet you said it twice that's its a BU circulation like you are 100% sure so I'm asking, does BU circulation really weigh 2.8grams?
just to add up: I really hate schooling people but the correct way of assessing this is to ask for a magnification photo of the coin, if you see a multiple strike marks or not, that's how you can tell if its proof or Bu circulation. I hope you are aware of PR60 and impaired proof. In the end its still called a proof.
Edited by DynexBATS 02/20/2023 12:55 pm
|
|
Forum Dad
 United States
24161 Posts |
Quote: I really hate schooling people but the correct way of assessing this is to ask for a magnification photo of the coin, if you see a multiple strike marks or not, that's how you can tell if its proof or Bu circulation. Wow, you're schooling me? I'm aware most proof coins are struck twice, but I've never see "multiple strike marks" on a proof coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
25229 Posts |
DynexBATS, how did you determine that this 1975 LMC is a proof coin?  
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
DynexBATS,  What are you using to take photos with? A copper cent should weigh 3.1 grams +/- .12 grams mint tolerance. Proof and business strike coins will weigh the same. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1657 Posts |
None of those coins look even remotely like proof coins. If one is underweight, that is another indication of a normal business strike, it is quite common for business strike coins to be off weight a bit, but the mint is more careful with proof coins.
Edited by lcutler 02/20/2023 5:24 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96112 Posts |
I wish I could see even one proof in your lot, but, alas, there is none. How did you come to the conclusion that these business and somewhat damages coins are proofs - also how do you correlate BU coins to being only 2.8 grams? especially when you have a mixed lot of quarters, dimes, nickels, and cent coins (non of which should weigh 2.8 grams).
|
|
Valued Member
United States
218 Posts |
To make this clear to OP (as it doesn't seem anybody has specified this yet): the Denver mint has never made proof versions of circulating coins. Proofs were made in Philadelphia with no mintmark in 1964 and before, and in San Francisco with an "S" mintmark since 1968. Quote: just to add up: I really hate schooling people but the correct way of assessing this is to ask for a magnification photo of the coin, if you see a multiple strike marks or not, that's how you can tell if its proof or Bu circulation. I hope you are aware of PR60 and impaired proof. In the end its still called a proof. Whoever told you this is severely misinformed. "Impaired proofs" are a thing - but they have to actually be proofs first. There's no indication that any of these coins are anything other than regular circulation strikes, judging by the pictures and by the dates and mintmarks themselves. Also, that 1963 nickel is not 90% silver. It's made of an alloy of 25% nickel and 75% copper, the same as any other nickel since 1866 (with the exception of the 35% silver War Nickels made from 1942-1945).
Edited by DiscoLover82 02/21/2023 08:25 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
797 Posts |
All normal business strikes that has been cleaned/polished.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,483 |
Page 2 of 2
|