| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,849 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15417 Posts |
That photo is way too pixilated to see anything. Sorry but can't help with that image. Here is a PCGS image of the tail of the 2 peeking out from the 3. Do you see this on your coin? 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
180 Posts |
No definitely don't have that tail on the 3.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34402 Posts |
I agree that even if this grades AU, finding it in the wild is a great deal. Definitely worthy of saving in a 2x2. Well done!
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
180 Posts |
Would you put a price on that 2x2? It got me like 
Edited by jvcv_0 04/16/2023 07:06 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2281 Posts |
How do you get to ms65?
I'm genuinely curious.
This is au at best and not full steps.
$1-1.50 value
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2954 Posts |
There is another error to look for on the 1943-P, the doubled eye DDO. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
180 Posts |
Quote: How do you get to ms65?
I'm genuinely curious.
This is au at best and not full steps.
$1-1.50 value Melt value alone is 1.43 and condition makes it $10?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
180 Posts |
Quote:Yes, that is a die crack on the reverse. They are seen often on War Nickels and, while technically an error, do not add any value to the coin. First time I find a bona fide die crack and it's worth nada?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Nice find for sure. I'd say AU-55/58.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19150 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15417 Posts |
Quote: First time I find a bona fide die crack and it's worth nada? Sorry - but as I said reverse die cracks are common on all of the War Nickels. If this coin truly were MS with full steps (which it is not) then that die crack would actually considered a negative to most collectors and decrease the coins numismatic value. There are some fun ones though. I once had a relatively high grade 1944-S Jefferson where the die crack bisected the S mint mark vertically to resemble a $ symbol.
Edited by nickelsearcher 04/16/2023 11:59 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95740 Posts |
Die cracks are merely a 'die event' and usually don't add any value, unless they are spectacular in appearance. Even then, you would need to find a buyer that has interest in coins with die cracks.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2281 Posts |
Like I said, where do you get MS65 from? I want to see your thought process. No idea where you get $10 from either, this is not worth $10. Nice find in the wild, but let's be realistic and learn properly so you aren't another one of these Etsy deluded people.
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Edited by NumismaticsFTW 04/16/2023 5:25 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
It's a nice coin, but very common I'm afraid.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
81 Posts |
Yes, I just bought a slabbed War Nickel. The most common MS grades for a given year/mint tend to be MS66. MS 67s are pretty common. 67+ and 68 are where the most value is. I do not think there is anything available more than MS68. MS 66 Full stairs (FS) compete with say MS 67 non-FS. I bought an MS 67+ 1944-S (a good date/mint combination, but not FS) for a somewhat reasonable price- less than an MS 66 FS. I see MS-67 FS for 3-4 x the price. Even MS 66 FS is 1.25-1.5x. San Francisco had the fewest FS, Denver the most. What are your thoughts on what is better- an MS 67+ non-FS (1944-S) vs. say an MS 65 or 66 with FS? It is not an easy question. I think the MS67+ non-FS is actually rarer than the lower grade FS, but many collectors want the FS (though the typical condition for 1944-S is actually non-FS). I am not second guessing my decision (I actually learned about a lot of this after I bought- I bought based on relative rarity of the condition independent of FS or not).
Edited by JohnQPublic 03/14/2026 3:38 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,849 |
Page 2 of 2
|