| Author |
Replies: 35 / Views: 5,788 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts |
Again, there's not much doubt here. Really a wonderful find. Diggin Dude, sorry to redirect for a minute, but I think you'll be interested in this as well... Bob, just want to draw your attention to another thread I don't think you've seen, also a metal detecting find from a bit further up the NYS Thruway. This one more along your lines of interest!: http://goccf.com/t/444813
Edited by realeswatcher 05/09/2023 02:03 am
|
|
New Member
United States
1 Posts |
FYI.... I have found that higher end gold and precious metals Brokers have the high end XRF Testers that can now break down an alloy into it's individual elemental composition percentages with exacting accuracy. Within a fraction of a percentage point. Especially when checking thinner materials like coins & jewelery. No kidding, even trace metals!!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189767 Posts |
 to the Community, Metalversity!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
realeswatcher - I checked that thread as you suggested, and it would appear that they may have located the site where counterfeits were produced. Two matching examples and a planchet in the same location could point to a forgery ring operating in that vicinity.
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
Reales watcher. Thanks for posting that link! I'm going to be watching that thread really interesting!
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
Metalvarsity, Thanks for the information, much appreciated
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
SwamperBob, I think that possibly locating a very old counterfeiting ring location is exciting. Through this form, I'm just learning of some of the work you've done on counterfeits over the years. I hope those gentlemen are able to speak to you somehow through some type of private messaging regarding this important discovery.
I will search this forum, if you don't mind saving me some time, what are the books that you have put out over the years regarding coins and counterfeits and so on
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
I have written one full length book to date. Counterfeit Portrait Eight-Reales is available at Amazon.com. The hard cover edition was sold out in a year, but the soft covers are still in production. I had hope to do an update adding 150 new varieties, but my work on a second book has prevented that to date.
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
Bob, I will pick one up! Thanks
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
I was able to find a university to do the XRF test on the 8 reales. I will not post the University name, so it does not get bombarded with requests. I was not able to get a percentage print out report I was allowed to take a photo of the spectrum analysis. Below are photos spectrum, Over 90% silver content, and a small percentage of copper. The small peak circled in yellow would be less than 1% AU According to the person performing the test. There are no other strange elements involved.  
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
While I was there, he agreed to test several other coins. For this thread, I had him test to 1740 half Real I found a half a mile away from the 8. It ended up having a slightly higher copper content (compared with the 8) and a very low iron peak, which might be due to the iron polluted ground. I found it in. There were lots of square nails in the section of ground I found it in. Here is the photo of the 1740 half XRF spectrum 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
I am not familiar with that particular readout, but both tests show a similar pattern of peaks which would indicate a very similar alloy. Both appear to show a similar "under 1%" reading for gold. I only wish the operator had given you some indication of how far under one percent. One percent equals 10,000 ppm, so under 1% is a very widespread. However, the general similarity between the alloy of the two coins makes me believe that both are in fact genuine and that you have made a remarkable find. I know that you have no intention of selling the coin, but you may still want to have it authenticated to preserve it. You should also leave a detailed statement about the location and date of the find along with the pictures of the XRF tests for your heirs. That way you will leave a well-documented historical asset for the future. One final comment is in order. The value of having an XRF test of the coin BEFORE submission to a TPG is to document the alloy and authenticity before it is encapsulated. None of the fundamental scientific tests of a coin like this can be made AFTER encapsulation. So, it is time well spent to always weigh a coin accurately, determine its density and do the XRF test prior to having it "certified" by a TPG which only uses a visual inspection done in a few seconds.
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
Thanks for your reply, Bob. Yeah I was happy to see that both Coin's had the same make up and there are no strange alloys. FYI, I've started your book. Definitely not light reading lol but very comprehensive interesting. It is my goal this summer to finish it, but I find myself rereading a lot of it to digest it so to speak. I wish this forum had a private message section so we could share email addresses. I'd rather not make mine public. There is more information and interesting coin finds I would be willing to discuss with you, but not on a public forum. Another coin found not too far from the 1740 HR was a 1662 oak tree 2 pence that I also had scanned. It actually had a higher silver content than the Spanish silvers, and a lower copper content. It was in a very wet area with horrible ground conditions, and extremely tarnished like it was in salt water. On the advice of a coin dealer, I sent it to NGD to get it conserved and graded. They won't verify authenticity unless it's gradable and with the environmental damage they would not grad it and they ruined the look of the coin with their restoration techniques. I was able to conserve it on my own using techniques that we use on English hammered coins we find in the ground in the UK. It turned out better than what they did. I am not willing to discuss those techniques because it would start a controversy on a coin collecting forum. I believe coin collectors don't fully understand the terrible conditions that most coins are in when unearthed from the ground, either by Detectorists and/or archaeologists. Anyway, I was glad to learn about XRF testing on coins through the site.  
Edited by Diggin Dude 05/18/2023 10:05 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts |
That's not a totally awful piece, to be fair... and the design is probably more discernible with less close up pics. Good find. Quote: I am not willing to discuss those techniques because it would start a controversy on a coin collecting forum. It's an anonymous forum with a bunch of random people - who cares? BTW, ever go on TreasureNet? There's also a detecting subforum here, though apparently not super active: http://goccf.com/f/52http://goccf.com/f/53Anyway, anyone reasonably involved with Spanish Colonial and/or wreck material... and certainly also early copper people... understands the challenges of mitigating environmental damage. The only thing REALLY "controversial" is when that veers into into "tooling", reengraving - basically anything that essentially tries to restore/replace detail that is gone. Some putty/wax, etc. to fill in bad pits... some "smoothing" to mellow overly porous surfaces... retoning of acid-stripped to white silver (which has been done on A LOT of large wreck recoveries)... those are more shades of grey. A bit of sensible repair to make an obviously compromised piece slightly more aesthetic is not the most egregious crime in the world. Quote: (NGC) ruined the look of the coin with their restoration techniques As I'm sure you know, when dealing with salvage finds, you have to figure out how much of the remaining detail in now intertwined in the corrosion. Particularly with coppers... there are pieces that look OK but if you try to strip it with acid, electrolysis or whatever and let it retone, you're left with a pitted mess with no relief/"look" left to it. Too "toasted", as they say. Sometimes best to just do a slight surface clean with soap,warm water and slight brushing/toothpicking, maybe some oil and call it a day. NGC does do bulk wreck/hoard conservation, but I really wouldn't expect greatness out of them on a one-off delicate piece. I believe Sedwick (Spanish Colonial/wreck specialists) does conservation? Someone like that, where they are more attuned to what they are dealing with, might be a better bet.
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
Realeswatcher
Obviously, you know about the different techniques, long term cooking in olive oil, cooking in olive oil with a splash of lemon juice, hot wax method, "coin cleaning pencils", fiberglass pencils, use of peroxide (coppers and brass only) if the condition needs it, spit in foil, etc. My favorite is when silver comes out of the ground nice and all I use is distilled water. Gold.well that's the easiest of them all, distilled water.
Colonial era coppers are the most difficult, depending on where they were made and when. Some USA state coppers are very delicate, and the details remain only in the tarnish patina.
Interesting you mention NGC doing shipwreck restoration. I was not aware of that. Unfortunately I was not happy with what they did to my coin but it's too late. I have it looking as good as it's going to look no thanks to NGC.
In the end, you try to do as little as possible to the Coin when cleaning it up after it's been in the ground a couple hundred years.
Thanks for providing those links. When I have spare time, I'll check them out and you mention treasure net. I used to post on treasure net with the same user name. You could probably see some of my old posts on there. Currently, I only post items that I can't identify on the "what is it" part of the forum.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 35 / Views: 5,788 |
Page 3 of 3
|