| Author |
Replies: 22 / Views: 2,128 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
271 Posts |
Quote: I hate to state the obvious, but who cares - it's a dollar. I tend to cringe when I hear that. I guess it was just the way I was raised. It's true, you can't even by a package of chips for a dollar these days. I remember when I spent 15¢ for a package of Planters Cheese Puffs in my youth.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
The denom to me makes no diff,I just wonder if the bank will swap it out for you. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7293 Posts |
It will cost more than a $1 to exchange it. Cost of gas, time, depreciation on your car. It's not worth the time or the value. If you really want to, put it together with change you have around the house and deposit it.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
190135 Posts |
Quote: I hate to state the obvious, but who cares - it's a dollar. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6637 Posts |
Quote: I hate to state the obvious, but who cares - it's a dollar.  And you got 50 cents worth of tape on it 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
190135 Posts |
Quote: And you got 50 cents worth of tape on it  To be fair, tape is not that expensive. Is it? 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10601 Posts |
Quote: To be fair, tape is not that expensive. I get 3M packing tape for 4$ a roll - 54 yards and the dispenser. Plus I get it free delivery so I don't have to waste gas or depreciate my car value! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
622 Posts |
Try and see. What happened to it?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
706 Posts |
I know the greater than 50% rule is true. That rule is logical. Otherwise someone could deposit two separate pieces at different times and double their money.
I'm not sure if the serial number rule is true. I don't think so. The Federal Reserve doesn't record serial numbers or even the federal reserve district when they destroy worn out currency. They don't really need the serial number for anything.
I wonder if a nationally chartered bank is obligated to exchange mutilated currency for their customers as part of their national charter. Maybe they just do it as a courtesy. I deposited some twos in really bad shape one time and they really didn't want to deal with them but they reluctantly did it anyway. I had two demonstrate that one had more than 50% remaining; they really didn't want that one. It was close but demonstrably greater than 50%.
The original poster could submit the note to the Bureau of Engraving and Printing using BEP Form 5283 for redemption. That would leave a net return of only 27 cents after paying for the postage. Nonetheless, it might make an interesting subject for discussion on this forum.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10601 Posts |
Quote: but who cares - it's a dollar. You never know - this could be the one -  
|
|
Moderator
 United States
190135 Posts |
Brilliant! 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
98746 Posts |
I would say no because the note does not have a complete serial number to log in.
(did your dog try to eat your beer money?)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
706 Posts |
Quote: I would say no because the note does not have a complete serial number to log in. [Emphasis added.] Respectfully, exactly when and where would you have to "log in" a complete serial number? It is not a field in the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) Form 5283. The BEP states: "Lawful holders of mutilated currency may receive a redemption at full value when:
1. Clearly more than 50% of a note identifiable as United States currency is present, along with sufficient remnants of any relevant security feature ..." I assert that the serial number is not a "relevant security feature" referred to in the above requirement and even if it were a "relevant security feature" the remaining seven digits would be "sufficient remnants."
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 22 / Views: 2,128 |
Page 2 of 2
|