Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

The U S Mint Director, Ed Moy's Statements

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 2,788Next Topic Page 2 of 2
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
189767 Posts
 Posted 08/17/2009  5:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list
with the last three posts! Stop minting the cent for circulation!

I would like to see them still minted for collectors though (with a new reverse, of course). At least with them all being NIFC, paying a premium won't seem as ludicrous.

But I won't be too upset if they quit minting them entirely. The Lincoln Cent has had an incredible run so far.
Pillar of the Community
United States
5637 Posts
 Posted 08/17/2009  7:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Morgans Dad to your friends list
Would it be a far fetched idea to think the U S Mint will be selling the 2009 Nickel and Dimes, Why stop milking the cow, when you know there is more to be had.

I also believe the LP1 and LP2, and LP3, will NOT be available at any bank near you soon, the politics of the topic are not equatable with being fair to others...

ALL in favor of making a coin with Mr Moy's face on the obverse, because of all his contributions to the U S Mints overall well being!!
Pillar of the Community
United States
5637 Posts
 Posted 08/17/2009  7:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Morgans Dad to your friends list
In part of Mr Moy's statements he says "But, you know part of this is just the way the Mint does its accounting and how we allocate our overhead costs"

The old "but you know", I do know that the sales from the LP1&LP2 have made the Mint "Millions" also it all comes from the only people who want the coins, because we/they have an urge to fill holes, "The Collectors"....
Pillar of the Community
United States
3098 Posts
 Posted 08/17/2009  8:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wd1040 to your friends list
Plus, it doesn't take account for the senioriage of just regular coins and those that people store away.

All that profit from stamping 25c coins on 3c pieces of metal goes towards the Treas, but as it goes through congress, somehow loses its ultimate direction of running the mint.
Valued Member
United States
207 Posts
 Posted 08/17/2009  10:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add markapsolon to your friends list
So the US mint uses our tax payer dollars to operate and to make a profit. Director Moy explains it like the mint is a private business..lol They never did this before they figured out it was big business in them there coin collectors..lol. At lest that is what is sounds like to me, am I wrong?
Pillar of the Community
United States
5637 Posts
 Posted 08/17/2009  10:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Morgans Dad to your friends list
If as Mr Moy states, "Ultimately, our tasks are to make coins for demand in everyday economic and commercial transactions. And the bottom line is, our economy is not doing too well."

I do think that all the record breaking sales and the profits being made by OUR U S Mint, due to the collectors buying up more than ever, would bring a sense of thinking"maybe we should be some-what more assisting to all of those collecting coins and re-think the way things are done, like sell the 2009-P&D strikes to the collecting public for a nominal fee, this way I know seems like a fix all, but the Mint would be making more$$$$, we as a group would be happy we are not left for the Gouging E-Bay sellers, and all would be fine in Kansas( Eaglefoot), LOL.

I know the feds are directly responsible to distribute the coinage for the needed commerce for everyday transactions but you would think some-one would help us, the small Minority out, and let the coins be had, at face value......

PS: Also did any-one else hear the idea about producing a coin with the Mint director's face on the Obverse, save the Planchets and lets get some ASE'S out to meet the public demand, as the law states!
Valued Member
United States
187 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2009  06:55 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add VictoryBullion to your friends list
A government run entity


case closed
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2009  2:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list

Quote:
All that profit from stamping 25c coins on 3c pieces of metal goes towards the Treas, but as it goes through congress, somehow loses its ultimate direction of running the mint.

Actually the cost of running the mint is deducted before the balance is turned over to the Treasury. The Mint does pay its own way and doesn't receive appropriations from Congress anymore. At least that is my understanding.


Quote:
I do think that all the record breaking sales and the profits being made by OUR U S Mint, due to the collectors buying up more than ever, would bring a sense of thinking"maybe we should be some-what more assisting to all of those collecting coins and re-think the way things are done, like sell the 2009-P&D strikes to the collecting public for a nominal fee, this way I know seems like a fix all, but the Mint would be making more$$$$, we as a group would be happy we are not left for the Gouging E-Bay sellers, and all would be fine in Kansas

The Mint would probably make a lot more money and could reduce their prices if they would fix their shipping costs. Believe it or not the Mint loses a TON of money on shipping. Say you order three items and they don't get shipped to gether an after they arrive you return one for replacement. You pay (rounded figures) $5 for shipping. The Mint pays shipping on three package ($15), Reimburses return shipping for one ($5) and then pays shipping to send the replacement ($5). The Mint has now paid $25 for shipping that you paid $5 for. A loss of $20. The problenm is that such losses fororders seem to be the rule rather than the exception. Solution, don't ship multiple item orders until ALL of the items are available. Of course the collectors are not going to be happy with that either. Remember no matter what the Mint does, the collectors are NEVER going to be satisfied.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2009  4:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list

Quote:
The Mint does pay its own way and doesn't receive appropriations from Congress anymore.

That is what I understand as well, the US Mint is entirely self-sufficient and receives no tax dollars

Quote:
I do think that all the record breaking sales and the profits being made by OUR U S Mint, due to the collectors buying up more than ever...

You might want to try reading the US Mint's annual fiscal report as that would dispel your misconceptions about these "record breaking" numismatic sales. Do you know the source for the vast majority of the Mint's net income? It is certainly not numismatic sales. Seigniorage income from FY2008 amounted to $706.2 million while total numismatic and bullion income amounted to a mere $100.2 million, those numbers are derived from total revenue of $2.8 billion. Numismatic income is up from FY2007 but compares favorably to FY2005 and FY2006 and if not for record-breaking bullion sales, the number would have been much lower for 2008. If the US Mint was a private company, it would rank #710 on the Forbes 1000 list based on their 2008 total revenue.

I would recommend that every collector read the US Mint Annual Report, it is an excellent window into the fiscal operations of the Mint. It is a big PDF download at over 35mb and a long read at 70 pages but here is the United States Mint 2008 Annual Report
I pulled the numbers from a handy chart on page 2
Edited by biokemist6
08/19/2009 4:04 pm
Pillar of the Community
United States
3098 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2009  4:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wd1040 to your friends list

Quote:
That is what I understand as well, the US Mint is entirely self-sufficient and receives no tax dollars


Really? I never knew that. Well perhaps congress can do something.

Is the RCM privatized?
Pillar of the Community
United States
5637 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2009  9:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Morgans Dad to your friends list
Conder101, I must of been the exception to the exception, I returned 1 of the 2009-silver proof sets, because of the damaged coins, and was refunded my return shipping costs, actually was informed it will be in my hands in 2-3 weeks, They did give me a brief refund of $52.95 for the set and DID NOT refund the shipping cost to return or replace the set they are sending me, they kept the $4.95 original shipping charge and I would guess they applied it to the set they are sending me as the amount they charged me for the replacement set was $52.95.

Bio, I tried to read the site you have posted in your reply, I could not get there, Maybe me I am not sure.
I see you wrote that you have no problem with anything Mr Moy said, I find it hard to believe a collector, who IMO, is also very passionate about knowledge and having the ability to get some of these 2009 coins, would agree with the directors statements, simply put, the Mint finds the time to sell coinage for $8.95 plus $4.95 shipping for the rolls of Lincoln cents, and he states that the mint has it's 1st and foremost job of getting the coinage out to the commerce and business's for use and basically, has no interest or concern for the "collectors" besides the Millions the coins sold to "collectors" made the U S Mint, Also I really am not concerned about the overall Billions of dollars the Mint took in, or where it came from, simply put the words of the director are not "collector friendly" and IMO, He has an opportunity to make changes, I know Congress sets the laws and guidelines, but He could do more to rally on behalf of the millions of people and collectors who have been and will keep on looking to fill holes in albums if we could just find the coins some where.

I see you are an optimist in that you believe we all will be able to get our hands on the illusive 2009 coins,at face, I think we some day will see them, but not as you seem to state, you see more and more.I for one do not like to be in a game when others have an ace up their sleeve, maybe some day on HSN, we will see ALL the coinage we are not able to have, other than paying through the nose from the "special ones."
Why did you go to the 3rd release, to have a part in an historic event and Get Some Rolls of the coins you could not find, for face value, just as I did for the 2nd release. Again it is simply not right, unless the parties involved( the U S Mint, and the powers to be )are making money!!!

Also when things are written they could easily be taken out of context, Please do not misunderstand I am simply, like you, an outspoken person who enjoys life when the playing field is level for ALL!!
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 08/19/2009  10:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list
That link is a .pdf file so you will need Adobe Reader(free software)
Pillar of the Community
United States
5637 Posts
 Posted 08/20/2009  09:55 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Morgans Dad to your friends list
Thanks Bio
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 08/21/2009  11:12 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list

Quote:
Conder101, I must of been the exception to the exception, I returned 1 of the 2009-silver proof sets, because of the damaged coins, and was refunded my return shipping costs, actually was informed it will be in my hands in 2-3 weeks, They did give me a brief refund of $52.95 for the set and DID NOT refund the shipping cost to return or replace the set they are sending me, they kept the $4.95 original shipping charge and I would guess they applied it to the set they are sending me as the amount they charged me for the replacement set was $52.95.

No you are not the exception, the Mint is losing money on shipping one your order. You ordere and paid the $4.95 shipping. The mint used that to pay to ship the set to you. You returned it and paid to ship it back. (At this point it gets little hairy. The Mint has never automatically refunded the return shipping, you have to contact them and specifically request it, then they would refund the return shipping. HOWEVER under a recent new rule change they announced that they would no longer reimburse for the return shipping. HOWEVER, several people have request shipping refunds since the new policy went into effect and have still received them.) The Mint did not refund your originaly shipping for the set, because they used it to send the set to you. But they did not charge you another shipping fee to send you the replacement set so they will be paying that out of their own pocket.

So in effect you have paid two fees and had two shippings one to you and one return. The Mint has recived one shipping fee but is paying for two shippings original set and replacement. If you are able to request and receive reimbursement, you will be down to paying once and the Mint will be up to paying three times. (And frankly have you checked the shipping fees from the various shippers? A lot of the Mint stuff winds up going UPS and FedEx and you can't ship a package with them for $4.95 so the Mint is subsidizing the shipping anyway. The Mint LOSES money on shipping. Sometimes more than they make on the product.)
Pillar of the Community
United States
5637 Posts
 Posted 08/21/2009  1:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Morgans Dad to your friends list
Conder101, I totally agree, that is what happened. I would also believe the U S Mint has a "volume" discount with the Fed-Ex or who ever, I use to work for the Largest tree company in the world, they had a "very nice" volume discount given to them at Fed-Ex and all who ship in huge bulk.
I also did receive the cost of returning the proof set from the Treasury, I also included insurance and was paid in full.I received another set, although it is nicer than the one I returned, it has some shiny spots on the frosted relief and I figure I tried and am done, soon will be reducing my Mint orders to a bare minimum and hope the quality people come back to work since taking a leave of absence in early 1982!!

Today, not to get off the subject, I read an article that the U S Mint is going broke, since 2003, because they say it costs 1.87 cents to make a cent and to make a nickel it costs them 8.37 cents to produce. They go on to say that Congress is the only entity to change this and there was a bill in 2008 proposing to change the coins composition but never made it to a vote, kind of leaves you to wonder what will the coinage of the next few years be made of, I hope it will last longer than the "melt-away copper plated zinc dispose a coin alloy!!"
They also state they are not having the same"making no money on the other coins" problem.






Page 2 of 2   Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 2,788Next Topic Page 2 of 2
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.57 seconds to rattle this change. Forums