| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 12,909 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1523 Posts |
Thanks Jason. It is 27 mm across in the center.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
220 Posts |
It looks like a cast coin to me.
If this is real, this should be a W-690, Noe-1, Crosby 12-1 large planchet pine tree shilling due to 1) top of tree points to S, 2) with H (not Masatusets), 3) diameter within 27-31 mm, and 4) six pairs of branches not gently curved upward.
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16846 Posts |
I'd vote for "not real". If it really is all bubbly and grainy like it looks in those pics, then it's almost definitely a cast fake.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Valued Member
United States
220 Posts |
We can always count on Sap, a very responsible moderator.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1523 Posts |
It's not bumpy at all. It's quite smooth it just has some pitting on the surfaces.If it were cast would it not be magnetic?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2521 Posts |
Quote:
If it were cast would it not be magnetic? Only if it were cast out of a magnetic material. A cast coin is simply a coin made from pouring the liquid metal into a mold. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1523 Posts |
Do you think they would have used silver ratman?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
220 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
1 Posts |
Hi Halfwitty, just joined the family and wanted to know if you determined with 100% certainty this 1652 NE Pine Tree's real or fake?
Thanks!
|
|
Moderator
Australia
16846 Posts |
Unfortunately, Mr. Halfwitty had a disagreement with the forum's swearword filter and no longer posts here.
However, it can be said quite definitively that it's not genuine. The bubbly, fuzzy appearance is typical of a crude cast fake and, as dollarcoins pointed out, the weight is at least twice as high as it should be. Genuine pine tree shillings are relatively thin (especially these "early thin" varieties), as is typical for late mediaeval and early modern hammered coinage. A cast copy can't easily be made that thin, because there wouldn't be enough space between the moulds for metal to pour properly. This explains why so much metal had to be used to make this one.
In short, this is a replica, rather than a counterfeit. The people who made it weren't really trying to fool anybody.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Valued Member
United States
220 Posts |
Thank you for sharing the information, Sap. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
Quote:
Unfortunately, Mr. Halfwitty had a disagreement with the forum's swearword filter and no longer posts here wh-what? halfwitty's gone?  |
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
Has all the tell tale signs of a cast copy, one of many floating around.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2540 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 12,909 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/07/2010 5:29 pm
