| Author |
 Replies: 27 / Views: 6,557 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1713 Posts |
Quote:
3) Collar partially engaged. When the coin is struck metal flows outward - if the collar is present the metal flow is constrained, if not the metal flows outward such as in a broadstrike. The result is that the part of the rim where the collar was not engaged extends outwards. If the collar is at an angle we have a tilted partial collar (I have seen many Australian dollar coins of this type), if not at an angle we have what the Americans call railroad rim coins (all the predecimal partial collars I have seen are of this type; I've also seen Australian 2c coins). https://goccf.com/t/29228&whichpage=2From my understanding, I think the coin edge is an example of a railroad rim. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1713 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
56 Posts |
i have a 1994 dime that look just like that. are these coins worth anything? or dose this hsppen alot?
|
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
I'm still trying to figure out what this is. Your dime may be broadstruck. This is not. Post a picture of your dime.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19964 Posts |
Post it in the errors forum for bill, mike and chuck to look at. It's quite strange, I've never seen one like it.
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Valued Member
United States
85 Posts |
I think it might have been microwaved. Heated to expansion then discolored when it cooled. Why, because that sounds like the kind of stuff we would have done in shop if we had had a microwave. I do have acid dipped cents to 1.2 grams with great detail, a chrome 1953 D a 1948 with the inside half of the 8 removed so it's a phony looking 3.
Just a guess though.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
85 Posts |
If the coin were a railroad rim, would not the features inside the rim be the correct size ? The cent shown has a distorted enlarged bust of Lincoln, I think.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
85 Posts |
OK. Heated then pounded out.
|
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
Quote:
The cent shown has a distorted enlarged bust of Lincoln, I think.
Exactly. That is exactly what it looks like. I am starting to believe the only way this is possible, is because of heat too. It does look distorted  swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Never tried this, but place a coin between two pieces of leather and squeeze in a vise. You would probably have the same thing? The edge is affected because the planchet is squeezed to flatten and widen the devices. I don't have a vise to try this, but I feel this is what happened.
Edited by coop
05/16/2010 05:17 am
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1943 Posts |
The edge of this coin does not show a partial collar. A partial collar has expanded metal (or a flange) on one side only. This coin has expanded metal on both sides like we see on coins broken out of lucky coin holders. This looks like a Texas coin to me with something done around the edge. Maybe it was smashed out to expand into some novelty holder and then broken out but that is just a guess. Either way it happened outside of the mint. This is post mint damage and not an error.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2738 Posts |
This is, in fact, a " Texas Cent". The coin was flattened (crushed or hammered) between two pieces of leather or other somewhat giving material. Proportional expansion of the design on both faces is an impossibility for a genuine strike. The flattened design and a concave edge are also clear signs of alteration outside the Mint. Error coin writer and researcher.
|
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
Thank you Mike. I'll file this one away as such.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Mike is, of course, right on the money. It is a " Texas Cent" as they are called and it was hammered to that size. |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 27 / Views: 6,557 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 05/12/2010 9:19 pm
