| Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 5,476 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Member
United States
3242 Posts |
Yes you need to get that graded anacs,ngc or pgs You my have to wait be it will be worth it!! I grew up in up state NY a friend had copper coin he thought it was a pendent or cheap belt piece. I went back to Catskill in 1982 and someone from from suny Albany collage had seen it and make long story short its was 1 off the elephant coin almost perfect but the hole. He sold it for 25000.++ I was told by his brother
|
|
Forum Mom
 United States
5877 Posts |
Welcome to our CC family!  If this coin is genuine, I believe it's the Outlined Shield variety, but the outlining looks a little wide. The obverse looks a little off with the line under the horse's head being a little low. Here are images of a genuine 1787 New Jersey copper Outlined Shield:   Even with the obverse struck off-center, it looks different from yours. The denticles are much different. I'm afraid I think yours might be fake. You will need to send it to PCGS or NGC if you believe that it's genuine. ANACS does not authenticate or grade colonials yet.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
snook, under the circumstances of your discovery, it is all the more imperative that you get it authenticated. There are too many scenarios in which fake colonials come into discovery, but "salting" seemingly rare coins into old houses is certainly right up there. Here's an example of a wannabe colonial "found in Savannah". The seller has sold hundreds of such colonials; they are almost certainly forgeries. If he/she (husband/wife team) had such a genuine treasure trove,the State of Georgia's Historic Preservation Division might have a few questions for them: http://cgi.ebay.com/1701-Colonial-T...ah_W0QQitemZ170020031760QQihZ007QQcategoryZ544QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
after looking at the one Susan posted a picture of and comparing it to yours I would have to say I believe it to be a fake also, and not a very good one at that. the date on your coin even looks cheesy to me and the animal on the coin doesn't look right either. I usually use extreme caution when telling someone their coin is fake (especially when I am not very knowledgeable about the series) and am in no way saying I'm 100% sure it is a fake but from comparing the two pictures they sure do have allot of differences between them
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
snook or anyone else who wants to get into this NJ colonial very deeply, here's a definitive source (Notre Dame) for information: http://www.coins.nd.edu/ColCoin/Col...r.intro.html To compare this 1787 NJ colonial copper with authenticated originals will take a lot of time, but this site seems to offer as good a selection of colonials as any for comparison. It also has in-depth history of NJ (and other) colonials. Thanks to Doug Prather of the World Internet Numismatist Society (WINS) for his timely email containing the Notre Dame reference to colonials. Fred
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
ok I see there are some differences in the way they look on different coins on that page so my comparison to the first one and the one Susan posted wasn't a very good one so I am going to withdraw my response and again say I know nothing of the series so I don't need to respond and apologize for stating something that may not be true in my past statement
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2177 Posts |
Hey Snook!! Welcome. Nice coin!! We Have A New Member!!
|
|
Banned
New Zealand
306 Posts |
In my view,this coin isn't really a Colonial American coin,as it was struck after 1776.The last colonial American coin was the 1773 Virginia 1/2d. (Halfpenny).
Aidan.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
Aidan, now we're getting into nomenclatural questions although you are technically correct. The US Constitution wasn't written until 1787 and not ratified until 1789. Until then, the Articles of Confederation governed the states (which still called themselves "colonies"; and some still do) and did not have adequate provisions for coinage. The first US-minted coins weren't authorized until the Coinage Act of 1792. Until that point and far beyond (into the 1850s) until US-minted coins predominated, the specie of the land was a conglomeration of coins: Mexican and Spanish reales, British pennies and pounds, French francs, and any other coin which the colonists could get their hands on including pre-Revolution and post-Revolution state, local, and bank issues. With some exceptions, most every coin minted on US soil before the US Mint started producing Half Dismes in 1792 and half-cents in 1793 may be considered "colonials" and are lumped into the "colonial" category more as a matter of convenience than as a practical matter.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
99 Posts |
I'm sending it in next week, so we will soon see. Thanks for the help and opinions folks! 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
99 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2684 Posts |
snook, please let us know how it comes back from the TPG. I think all of us have it on our subscription lists, so we're very interested. Best of luck! I hope it works out well for you. Fred
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1091 Posts |
Isn't it amazing, the different die varieties of the time. I wonder how hard it was to counterfeit in those days? Still if you got caught the penalty would be more severe than today. I hope it's a good one, even if it isn't I'd still keep it in my collection. Is there anywhere in the USA that sell "Replica" coins of this era?  I have bought some "reproduction coins" when I visited Warwick Castle in England. They have sets from Celtic times through the dark ages to Medieval times and then Tudor and on to Georgian and Victorian times. They are produced by a company called Westair Reproductions Ltd. (the only way I was going to own those coins.)
Edited by toast 08/21/2006 05:20 am
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
99 Posts |
Hey guys, I'll post the results when I get 'em
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4589 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by Morgan Fred
snook, under the circumstances of your discovery, it is all the more imperative that you get it authenticated. There are too many scenarios in which fake colonials come into discovery, but "salting" seemingly rare coins into old houses is certainly right up there.
Here's an example of a wannabe colonial "found in Savannah". The seller has sold hundreds of such colonials; they are almost certainly forgeries. If he/she (husband/wife team) had such a genuine treasure trove,the State of Georgia's Historic Preservation Division might have a few questions for them: http://cgi.ebay.com/1701-Colonial-T...ah_W0QQitemZ170020031760QQihZ007QQcategoryZ544QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 5,476 |
Page 2 of 2
|