| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 3,086 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
273 Posts |
Of the batch #1 or #3. #5 is whacky!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
It might depend on what your purpose of the best photo is:
To get an honest image of the coin, I would say #1....I see less rim on that one, so it is probably the closest to dead on flat.
The details seem to stand out a bit better in #2.
If the intent is to sell it, maybe either #4 or #5 would be the photo of choice, there is nothing quite like a picture of a coin taken at an extreme angle to throw off the logical perceptions of a prospective buyer.
#3 may be the best if you are wanting to hide the residual film of dirt on the coin though.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1081 Posts |
I like #3 as far as detail goes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2120 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
438 Posts |
Placing my vote for #1 as being the most natural looking picture.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
I vote NO....number one hides the most....I guess it depends on what you want to be seen...
|
|
Valued Member
United States
438 Posts |
I kind of thought the other way around... it seems like #1 shows the most nicks and marks, particularly on the neck, and lower obverse fields.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3294 Posts |
I would go with either 2 or 3.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
321 Posts |
I say 1. The marks in the fields aren't washed out by reflection. The heavier marks on the face are highlighted by the light angle, while they are shadowed in most of the others. I really think you should go with 1. but DEFINITELY not 3. The cheek and left fields are the most important part of grading the Morgan dollar and they are both absent of any light focus. Most of the light concentrates on the right side and hides many of the marks that can be seen in 1. If I saw 3 online, I would pass it immediately, saying to myself "what does this guy have to hide if he is keeping the most important part of grading darker than the rest of the coin?" |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2424 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
667 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
#1 is the only possibility. Any pic which does not show the coin square can be deceptive, and should only be used for illustrating luster.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
667 Posts |
At times when I look at them again they appear to be the same coin.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
455 Posts |
Number one is by far the best photograph as it reveals the luster within the fields.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
the question is the question of why to post such a question... and why?is it to best represent the coin to its actual appearance or how best to hide some of the obvious defects on the coin......this is the best we can do to understand photo's , I am not attacking this poster, but rather addressing the PHOTO ISSUE....and in many a post the photo's are bad and the grading is high.........and someone with a better camera that shows detail gets shut down and poorer grades...evaluations...is this something most people forget?
Frankly I see to many MS 63/64 grades given with really crappy out of focus pictures..........
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,086 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 10/28/2010 10:07 pm
