Quote:
I see, I may start a new thread on this sunbject (If one doesn't exist) as there doesn't seem to be a consensus on this.Might never be, but I bet if you have some pics it could shed some light.Interesting..
A lot of people don't realize what a deplorable state the modern coins
and their markets are in. There are just too few collectors to absorb
all the coins so the coins are allowed to deteriorate in their original
packaging. It's not just the common garbage that's going bad but the gems
and more desirable coins as well. Even the few collectors of this mater-
ial often keep the coins original and the tarnish sneaks up on them.
The problem is quite extreme in som cases but no one seems to notice be-
cause people stopped their collections at 1964. The most dramatic is pro-
bably the 1968 cent. These are quite common in rolls but finding nice
choice coins in rolls is exceedingly difficult. They made a couple mil-
lion mint sets and the Philly cents in these tend very nice. Fully 5%
are gems and half are very choice. But 95% of these still in the original
packaging are tarnished and ugly now and can't be cleaned. The other 5%
are still attractive but all of them have carbon spots and these can't be
removed.
The same thing is gradully happening to lots of the mint set coins and if
they aren't caught early and stabilized in a solvent will also be irredeem-
able. Look at the '84-D cents. These were bad to start with and now half
of them are tarnished too. Most of the 40% halfs have problems. Gems can
be pretty elusive to start with and allowing most of them to disintegrate
will not help their availability. In tenty years it might not even be pos-
sible to assemble nice choice sets from the mint sets.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.