| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 2,230 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
158 Posts |
It's amazing how they can play with the photo to make it look that good
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
I would have said XF before everyone gave their opinion :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
784 Posts |
i just use a desk lamp that might be causing the shine I will take some others later. if they look different then I will post them. The bad thing about ebay is all the pictures are so small you cant really see.
Edited by pman860507 07/07/2011 9:21 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1081 Posts |
Wow, they definitely edited those pictures. The contrast looks way off and it may be overly saturated.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
The editing may make it look cleaned. I agree alot of dings. Wear on the obverse: tips of feathers, above eye, hair on neck, hair below ear, just to name a few areas. On the reverse: horizontal lines in shield, leaves in wreath, arrow heads, ribbon around arrows. Now this is just my opinion, I agree VF money and XF-40 details. Again thats just my opinion.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
784 Posts |
I completely agree. In hand the coin looks a lot better but once you get it in a picture its done for. What would your suggestions be on ebay feedback. I'm not going to return the coin. I'm just going to consider this one a loss.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
Could it because of a "soft strike"? Otherwise I would say XF-45. Still a nice IHC!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Detail is XF-45. He's a bit banged up and color is questionable so net grade of VF-35 or EF-40 is reasonable.
Regardless, nice Indian not nearly as ugly as most I have seen.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1817 Posts |
The photos you provided and the seller's make a world of difference. Detail wise, it is a XF-40. I disagree about the 'dings' however. They are small pits as 95% copper is easily damaged, a reputable IHC dealer would list such a coin as "XF detail, light corrosion" and discount it heavily maybe to G-VG pricing. It is not worth $12.00, IMO and if the return period is still valid, I'd return it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2757 Posts |
I would call that coin damaged (pitting) and list it for $4, and it probably wouldn't sell. Return it if you can.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
784 Posts |
I might contact the seller and see if I can work something out but I'm not sure if I will return it or not.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
Quote: I need to invest in a microscope.
A microscope? Or just better magnification? One of the best loupes I ever bought cost seven bucks. I recently paid $10 delivered for five magnifiers on ebay: http://cgi.ebay.com/320719604697A great assortment for starting out, one of them should work for you. They have multiple ads, don't pay more than the minimum. If you're serious about the microscope, get a stereo. Not cheap, but full 3d.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
132 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
784 Posts |
I actually got a loupe this week. it has a 10x and a 20x mag.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2757 Posts |
My loupe has a built in light. it comes in helpful at shows when the lighting sucks or something is hogging the light.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 25 / Views: 2,230 |
Page 2 of 2
|