| Author |
 Replies: 26 / Views: 2,862 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1348 Posts |
I have sent 3 halves like this in. All mine are 45s so this has to be a 50+
|
|
Valued Member
United States
374 Posts |
AU53/AU55 I like the toning also.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2936 Posts |
I'm going to notch it down to XF-40.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
438 Posts |
Based on NGC grading, I would say AU-53.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1590 Posts |
Stars are a little light, XF45
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
516 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
516 Posts |
Hey ACE Mike - Just curious, but what are NGCs tendencies on bust half coins that you've seen?
I like this coin better in hand than the pic.. a bit more luster, and a more attractive toning than I could capture on photo.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
maybe I did learn a thing or two at the summer seminar  Edited by Adam_E
07/17/2011 08:28 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
AU-55 seems a little high for this coin, could be the small areas of remaining luster that brought the grade up.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
438 Posts |
Maprince,
I have found that NGC tends to overgrade a bit in the EF and AU categories, say by about 3 to 5 points. In the photos, your half looks like about EF-45 to AU-50, so I just kind of added 5 points or so to what I thought the grade was, and arrived at my guess that way. Came pretty close, too!
NGC tends to do a bit better in the AU-55 area - often their AU-55's really are AU-55. I think they are worst at about AU-50; there are a lot of EF-45 bust halves in NGC AU-50 slabs, coins that I consider EF-45 based more on a lack of luster (other than traces between the stars) more so than having too much wear. My opinion only, others may disagree.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
516 Posts |
Perhaps the picture didnt do justice to the luster on the coin - and thus the dings.. I can actually see a decent cartwheel when rotating the coin.. I'd estimate about 50% of luster remains.. Pretty much all around the protected areas, and pretty absent from the fields.
Thanks for the observation ACE Mike -- it's great to take in the observations of everyone out there -- that's why I asked. I know to give a little more scrutiny to NGC busts in that grade range than some from PCGS... But again, that's why you always buy the coin, not the slab :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
NICE!! Great score!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
516 Posts |
I think I need to visit the photography section to learn how to better photograph luster on coins like this.  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 26 / Views: 2,862 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 07/16/2011 3:30 pm
