| Author |
 Replies: 23 / Views: 2,489 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
763 Posts |
How would you grade this one?  Thanks for looking! |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
I'm likely overgrading this, but I'm thinking MS-65
Imo, the toning adds to the eye appeal.
-MV
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
Very, very nice looking coin. I'm good at MS-65 and a CAC bean for sure.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1531 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1959 Posts |
I'm seeing 65-66. A real beauty!! Eye appeal out the gazoo!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1295 Posts |
I'll go with MS-67.
That is one AMAZING Barber!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
MS-66 Amazing coin!  |
|
Valued Member
United States
83 Posts |
MS-65 or MS-66. Beautiful coin!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
763 Posts |
Thank you for the grades and comments. My reaction to it was similar to yours when I bought it a little over a year ago in an old PCI MS64 slab. I cracked it out and submitted it to PCGS and here is what they gave it:  Needless to say, I was shocked. I thought there was a slim chance that it would come back AU58, but I don't see any signs of cleaning. The photos in my original post are the PCGS True Views. Here are my own photos of it:  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
Wow, that is disappointing. Lovely coin nonetheless. Is this one going up for sale?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
763 Posts |
I have no plans to sell it at the moment. I'm working on a complete Barber quarter set and I still think this is one of the nicest pieces in the collection. I got the PCGS grades about a year ago and it has taken me this long to calm down to a point that I can have a rational discussion about it:) |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
Ok, let me know if you want to sell it.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
360 Posts |
It's funny, I looked at this coin and instantly thought MS-Details, cleaned. I then did a double take and thought I was being too judgemental... still a nice looking coin though, and I'm not sure why they said AU and not MS  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
j-win, looking close now, I think I see a bit on wear on the eagle's tail but don't understand the cleaning designation. Perhaps a small, ancient wipe?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
360 Posts |
I'm not even sure, just something about the toning made me think it was possibly cleaned. I feel like TPG's are somewhat lenient on silver coins though, so I wouldn't have been suprised if PCGS had graded it MS64. |
|
Pillar of the Community
968 Posts |
I'd say 58+. Don't get the cleaning unless there are hairlines that aren't visible.
|
| |
Replies: 23 / Views: 2,489 |
Posted 04/17/2014 11:01 pm
