| Author |
Replies: 44 / Views: 3,257 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
I see it panzaldi, but that is literally like the only contact mark.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
With the OP's photos, the contact/bag marks cannot be seen and there should be some. Also there should be some evidence of luster scuff in the fields or on the face, as even 65's and 66's will exhibit them. The face has a grayness and roughness to it that should not be on a higher grade Morgan but is common on an AU Morgan.
Edited by 1893S 12/04/2015 8:29 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
258 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
My concern is the lack of luster or so the photos show. Possibly dipped? I don't know but those fields are ultra clean. If the coin has full cartwheel luster, easy MS65+ with a shot at 66.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
Your new photos are better. What you have is a polished AU coin. Quite evident!
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
258 Posts |
Edited by eric ramsdell 12/08/2015 7:16 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
258 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
52 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
374 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
258 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
That's over MS64 FMV and under MS65 FMV. I take it the buyer is confident it's an MS64+ with a shot at 65.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
Someone is not going to be happy!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
You may be right. It's virtually impossible to grade something like this from pics. Let us know if it is returned, please. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
258 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 44 / Views: 3,257 |