| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,224 |
|
Valued Member
Finland
265 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36905 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
The reverse does look to have been cleaned at some point, perhaps there was a bunch of gunk on it.
Overall a nice circulated coin graded as stated- low VF
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree it's possible the reverse may have been cleaned based on the slightly off-color, stronger flashback for those pics than on the obverse. But it matters little for a coin of such low value.
Edited by Coinfrog
11/11/2016 6:55 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Just makes VF-20 .Reverse might have had an old light cleaning .  |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
As the Frog ribbeted, it doesn't lose much value for any light cleaning as it isn't a high enough value for that to hurt it much.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16681 Posts |
Yup, agree VF20 details/cleaned
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 Finland
265 Posts |
Nice! I didn't fail this one  . |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Looks like normal wear to me, VF-20
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9873 Posts |
VF20
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
422 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
That's not luster. It is a sign that the coin has been cleaned.
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,224 |
Posted 11/11/2016 5:20 pm
