| Author |
Replies: 30 / Views: 5,255 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
142 Posts |
BTW...prices in my previous post do incude the buyer's premium.
|
|
Spammer
4 Posts |
The PCGS price guide is no different from any other price guide. It has it's strengths and weaknesses. Sometimes it is high. Other times, it is low. For the most part, it is meant to be a retail guide so it is closer to what you should expect to pay for coins rather than would you could expect to sell them for.
The main thing to keep in mind with price guides is that they try to give a one-size-fits-all price for a given date and grade while in reality no two coins are ever exactly alike. There are frequently coins that will bring multiples of the price in the guide and others that will only bring a fraction of that price.
Razi
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
DCV, I like your statistical approach......though I need to interject here. What kind of time span does your data cover? Heritage archives lists prices for coins that have sold for over the last 10 years. Its not entirely fair to compare the price a coin sold 10 years with what it is "currently" listed in the guide. Even if you look in the RedBook, some coins have increased dramatically over a period of a few years, plus there is that little thing called inflation. I think it would be a mostly fair comparison if all these coins sold in 2008. I'm not defending the PCGS price guide, as I agree it is inflated; I just dont think it is as much as perceived here...though I do think that super-high grade coins in general are over-valued. I'm happy with an MS-62 for ANY coin, but that's just me. :-)
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
142 Posts |
Johnny, you are absolutely right. My inexperience shows here and I am grateful for your bringing to my attention that there are significant price fluctuations over a few years. I wasn't aware that they changed so much. I have just learned something....which, of course, is why I'm here! Thanks!
As I recall, most of the Heritage prices were from about 2005-present.
Edited by dcv 06/05/2008 7:06 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
No problem dcv. I have learned sooooo much from folks on this site. And have learned some pretty important lessons regarding coins overall, some rather expensive regretfully. I still have a bunch to learn too. :-) If it is only over 3.5 years, then there probably isn't too much of a change, though I'm not up to date on SLQ trends. It astonishes me that people pay thousands of dollars for an additional point on the MS-scale; when most of the time the change in quality is barely perceptible. I recently purchased a 1930 near full head in AU/BU condition with a gorgeous candy orange tone for my type set. I paid $80 for it and couldn't be happier. :-)
|
|
Valued Member
United States
245 Posts |
dcv, For what it's worth, I have sent 1 coin to PCGS for grading. Mainly for authentication and because it was a key date. I have purchased a few PCGS coins, also ANACS, NGC, PCI, and a few other AHEM much less reputable reptilian TPG coins. I have never used the PCGS price guide. I generaly buy what I feel comfortable with, even though I overpay every now and again. If I want it, I'm gonna buy it. If I use a price guide, I'll make a rough grade for the coin, and consult Heritage and numismedia price guides. One of these days I may be able to afford another raw coin worthy of TPGing. If I do, it will be PCGS for the sole reason that they seem to hold a slight edge in the favorite position for collectors when it comes time to sell. I don't think it's as great an edge as it once was, but it's still an edge.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1934 Posts |
I use PCGS price guide as one of several resources -- the high-end potential price/cost. One component of my understanding of their pricing (because the guide shows ups/downs in coin values) is that those prices, while high, also reflect what the market is or may bear as reported by PCGS-authorized dealers. Most PCGS values are higher than Numismedia and the Red Book...most...some are the same. I cant simply be cynical about PCGS and allege their prices are solely based in attracting services. In our town, three of the largest supermarkets are owned by the same parent company; yet, the cost of the same can of beans differs from store to store. Go figure; do the math; shop wisely; be realistic.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
169 Posts |
The PCGS price guides seem to be way too optimistic to me. If I'm bidding on ebay or something, I don't think I ever want to pay more than 75% of the PCGS guide price. If I can get the coin at 50%, then I'm VERY happy with the deal. I don't yet have the skills to accurately grade high MS coins, so I prefer to buy slabbed coins, especially PCGS because they sell for the best prices. I also like to buy NGC coins, because they seem to sell for lower prices than PCGS coins, even though I think NGC has stricter grading standards for the MS 66 and 67 Lincolns I like to buy. I'm also convinced that if two identical coins are sold on ebay, one raw, and the other slabbed by PCGS, then the slabbed coin can easily go for 25% more than the raw coin. The disparity probably shrinks significantly for the auction houses that specialize in rare coins.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
142 Posts |
Well I have learned a lot here and have seen several different perspectives on this issue. Despite the fact that most all seem to agree that the PCGS prices are higher than most other sources (even if you differ on the reasons) I still find myself heading there whenever I need to assess a value. Maybe it is because it is fairly complete and well laid out. I know that in my mind I tend to factor in a 20%-25% reduction assuming I would probably not often buy, or be able to sell, a coin (especially raw) for the prices listed.
I guess I think of it like the sticker price for a car. No one really disputes its accuracy but everyone knows you can probably get it for less. It is a standard or a guideline and every once in a while a car (I know certain years and models of Honda were like this) was in such demand that people were paying sticker price and were on waiting lists to buy the cars. I suspect that this is also true of coins and PCGS prices. Demand is really what ultimately will determine the value of a coin and I am happy to know that people are actually buying the coins that please them personally, rather than just buying a slab sticker.
I like PCGS as sort of the "MSRP" or "LIST" price for coins. I think it is a great guideline and as I get more experience, I will be able to hone the mathematical formula in my head to make these prices more useful and realistic in any given circumstance.
Thanks to everyone for some very enlightening insights.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6384 Posts |
One other point on DCV's price listing for the 1930 MS66FH quarter: you notice that the realized prices increase over the data point sequence. The prices start out at $800 or so and finish up at about $1500 (or more!). That strongly indicates to what extent the purchase price for this coin has increased over the time period covered. Rather than compare the current PCGS price to the average of the whole data set, you might just use the last 10 or 15 values to calculate the average. The PCGS price list is continually updated and should represent what the coin will cost you NOW if you were to buy it at retail (or at a major public auction). The average for the most recent part of the auction archive values will be a lot closer to the current PCGS price guide value.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
142 Posts |
Jaobler, I think I understand what you are saying but the list is not sorted in chronological order of date sold but in ascending order of price realized. At the time I did this I had no clue the date sold would even be significant, so I sorted them this way just to more easily see the flow of the price range.
...Or did I misunderstand you completely? (Sorry, I can get pretty dense sometimes.)
Edited by dcv 06/08/2008 01:17 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6384 Posts |
Ah yes, I misunderstood your listing. I would bet that the highest prices were generally from the most recent auctions, but unless you actually sorted that way it wouldn't be completely correct.
If you want to pursue the question, maybe you could just select the prices realized for the last six months or so. I know for a fact that almost any high-end coin you go to buy now will cost more than it would have one year ago, so maybe a data window covering the last six months will give you an average value that is fairly close to what today's price would be.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
I can agree with whoever said that they're too low in some places, too high in some. I've seen a lot of coins go for above PCGS/red book, some for far below. On ebay, that is. It depends on many factors; how many people are watching it, time of day, etc. I'm no expert, but I generally consider 66% of PCGS price guide to be a great deal. 75% of a midpoint between PCGS and RedBook is also pretty good in my eyes. But it's hard to tell. My Red Book is 2008 and I'm aware it's already what....like 18 months outdated? I guess for slab candidates I could use it fully as a guide, but only those really. For non-slab candidates I'd side more with the red book/general observations. I'm sure this issue is far more complex than I am making it, though.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
One thing I wanted to ask a PCGS grader at the Long Beach Coin Expo was how a Sommer Islands Sixpence, the majority of which if not all, are found with metal detectors in Bermuda. How do these coins make it into a slab with no problems? The last one I saw had obvious corrosion and was graded VF20. I now know they grade problem coins, but this was years ago when I saw that specimen. I submit often and usually get 8/10 coins back in slabs. When I got a Morgan body-bagged with a miniscule little ding on the rim you can hardly notice, I always wonder how the Sixpence received a grade. Never got a chance to talk with a grader. They were busy at their table.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Valued Member
United States
128 Posts |
Quote: It represents something you wish you could get for your coins.
I believe this first reply was right on the money! Summed up nicely! Personally I don't particularly care for the tgc's. That being said, I don't have any single "high value" coins as of yet. I agree with what "David Bowers" often states in his writings in Coin World. Something to this effect... that there is something lost in the coin closed inside a plastic holder. Not by any means his exact words but this is what I extrapolate from his writings. What others have stated here regarding reasons to have certain coins graded by pcgs or ngc or others does make tremendous sense. I am sure in time I will be submitting coins to be sealed up in plastic holders. Heck I have bought slabbed coins from ngc pcg and others just for the comfort of knowing that I was buying what I was seeking. I do as others have mentioned compare the more frequently purchased raw coins and use the slabbed coins for comparison. One comment made about reading and attending classes is an excellent suggestion. I have done plenty of reading and have yet to attend one of the grading classes offered at the big shows or at the ANA seminars. I would just love to take one of those classes in just a matter of time and money of which of late I have little of either. What do you all think of coin worlds price guide. I think they too are inflated! I believe the grey sheets would be best for a price guide. Or better yet use the teltrade or heritage as a guide. If graded coins are what you are buying.
|
| |
Replies: 30 / Views: 5,255 |