Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1943 Nickel Transitional Error?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 9,549Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
BarlowAdams's Avatar
United States
69 Posts
 Posted 11/11/2019  4:05 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add BarlowAdams to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I'm fairly new to collecting and especially identifying the possible error coins in my collection. Is this a transitional error War Nickel? Thanks for any help you can provide.
1943-Nickel-Transitional-Error?
1943-Nickel-Transitional-Error?
Bedrock of the Community
IndianGoldEagle's Avatar
United States
36916 Posts
 Posted 11/11/2019  4:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add IndianGoldEagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Looks like a normal 43-P War Nic with a planchet lamination on the reverse.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 11/11/2019  4:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is a War Nickel with the silver planchet.
Valued Member
BarlowAdams's Avatar
United States
69 Posts
 Posted 11/11/2019  4:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add BarlowAdams to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I tried the drop test and it doesn't ring silver, but I've heard that is unreliable.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 11/11/2019  4:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The 1942 nickels had the type 1 (non Silver) and the Type 2 (Silver):
1943-Nickel-Transitional-Error?
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 11/11/2019  4:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Can you give us the weight? Looks pretty typical to me.



to the CCF!
Edited by Coinfrog
11/11/2019 7:51 pm
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 11/11/2019  5:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
1943-Nickel-Transitional-Error?
Bedrock of the Community
IndianGoldEagle's Avatar
United States
36916 Posts
 Posted 11/11/2019  5:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add IndianGoldEagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It has the correct color and toning for a circulated silver nickel.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
193620 Posts
Rest in Peace
moxking's Avatar
United States
17900 Posts
 Posted 11/11/2019  5:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add moxking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't detect anything unusual.
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 11/11/2019  7:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
What is a 1943 Nickel Transitional Error? Also,please crop and rotate photos properly before posting,thanks.
John1
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Pacificoin's Avatar
Canada
5414 Posts
 Posted 11/11/2019  9:56 pm  Show Profile   Check Pacificoin's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Pacificoin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It's a melt value War Nickel .
Valued Member
BarlowAdams's Avatar
United States
69 Posts
 Posted 11/17/2019  8:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add BarlowAdams to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Noticed something on this coin that I missed before I put it in acetone. Looks like there's some sort of raised mark under liberty on the reverse.
1943-Nickel-Transitional-Error?
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 11/17/2019  9:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There were counterfeit nickels about that time. They were called Henning nickels. The fake ones are worth more now than the real nickels. (go figure)
1943-Nickel-Transitional-Error?
1943-Nickel-Transitional-Error?
1943-Nickel-Transitional-Error?
1943-Nickel-Transitional-Error?
Valued Member
BarlowAdams's Avatar
United States
69 Posts
 Posted 11/17/2019  9:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add BarlowAdams to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Are you saying you think it's possibly one of those? That's definitely an added letter or something, right?

Mine does have a mint mark. And a laminate error on Monticello.
Pillar of the Community
United States
589 Posts
 Posted 11/17/2019  9:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Groszy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
No chance it's a Henning Nickel. All of them lacked a mint mark, that's how they were first noticed, and Henning (I believe) was caught.
  Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 9,549Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.45 seconds to rattle this change. Forums