| Author |
 Replies: 37 / Views: 3,343 |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11892 Posts |
I guess this proves that handling thousands of graded coins every year for 17 years doesn't make some people competent graders.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Thanks for the enlargements. I'd say 64 tops as well.  Edited by Coinfrog
09/29/2021 2:06 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
139 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11892 Posts |
The coin you posted is an ugly 64 at that not unlike its owner.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
139 Posts |
Haha now you guys are just salty, same old ebay and flea market coin guys that been here forever. I'll be back with the holder when I get it. #128540;#128537; |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Contact marks are only half the grade. At gem and above luster and eye appeal are paramount.
That said I agree your coin is likely a 64 and possibly a 65 on a good.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5672 Posts |
The luster on the PCGS coin is dramatically better than on your coin. We can only go by what we see in the pictures you present.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11892 Posts |
You may be one of those people who blindly rely on an opinion from someone who took 5 seconds to assess your coin. Here we like to think for ourselves. You should learn to grade instead of relying on the work others. That lesson applies beyond just coin grading.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
 edit to add - on your way out I suggest you take your coin photos and condescending attitude and post both on Collectors Universe, lol... Edited by dave700x
09/29/2021 2:51 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
612 Posts |
Quote:you guys really have no clue what your doing You guys are like flea market coin dealers and noobs Haha now you guys are just salty, same old ebay and flea market coin guys that been here forever The stupidity of the comments on this site Well Johnson my boy, with comments like that, I certainly can't say that your just trying to kiss up to the forum so they give you the grades you're looking for. On the other hand I wouldn't be surprised to see some VF grades coming your way, maybe even an details comment or two. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
I am one of the noobs that puts the coin at MS64 with a outside chance of MS65.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
I don't think the pictures are doing this coin any justice. Pictures aren't sharp enough and I think direct sunlight is causing the surfaces and luster to look more impaired than it really is. Fields do look clean, and I'll take a stab and say those cheek marks are pretty superficial. MS65 for me, with a possibility of a one point swing either way with better pics
@Johnsonr29, the comments about the forum members competency in grading is a bit unnecessary. Take a look at previous posts with accurate pictures and you'll find the group consensus is pretty darn accurate. We can only base grade on the photos provided. That said, either your photos aren't doing the coin justice, or your expectations are high. We won't know until we see accurate photos.
Edited by Ty2020b
09/29/2021 5:42 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
@Johnson29 - It's not often we get a chance to learn from someone with your experience.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7038 Posts |
I'm a noob, and all I got to say is WOW...  well the above statement was false, Looks like all the forum noobs have responded to your post.....   Edited by Greasy Fingers
09/29/2021 10:24 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
261 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 37 / Views: 3,343 |
First Page
Posted 09/29/2021 2:06 pm
