Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Shop CCF Members on eBay! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Commems Collection Classic: Medals Vs. Coins - 1947 Attempt

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,264Next Topic  
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12252 Posts
 Posted 11/08/2022  10:55 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I've written several posts regarding mid- to late-1930s efforts by Congress to stem the rising tide of US commemorative coins (see links below), but the passage of the Booker T. Washington Birthplace Memorial and Iowa Statehood Centennial Half Dollar bills by the 79th Congress (1946), appeared to signal that US coinage was once again "for sale" to those desiring a commemorative piece.

"Commemorative Coin Season" began in earnest in January 1947, with six bills/resolutions introduced in the Senate and referred to Committee by mid-February; companion bills for three of these were also introduced in the House in January. The Senate Subcommittee on Currency and Coinage (under the Committee on Banking and Currency) initially recommended that all six of the coin bills pass.

However, the flood of commemorative coin proposals garnered the attention of US President Harry S. Truman and Acting Secretary of the Treasury, Joseph J. O'Connell, both of whom wrote letters to the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency, Charles W. Tobey. Each of the letters expressed the author's concerns over the flood of new coin proposals, recommended that the bills not pass and stated the belief that commemorative medals should be struck vs. commemorative coins.

As a result, the Committee on Banking and Currency sent the bills back to its Subcomittee for reconsideration. The Subcommittee took the letters under advisement and changed its recommendations on the proposed coin bills - it reversed course, and reported the bills unfavorably to the full Committee. The Committee accepted the Subcommittee's new recommendation and reported the various bills out to the full Senate negatively without a recommendation to pass.

At the same time, the Committee drafted a bill "To provide for the striking of medals, in lieu of coins, for commemorative purposes." This medals bill was recommended for approval by the Subcommittee, and reported out for full Senate consideration. Section 1 of the bill stated:

"That in order to promote uniformity in the designs of the various coins of the United States, to facilitate their proper use as circulating media, to enable counterfeit pieces to be readily detected, and to avoid the confusion which arises from special issues of commemorative coins, it is declared to be the policy of the United States to authorize the striking of commemorative medals in lieu of commemorative coins and to discontinue the striking. of such coins." Language crafted by the Teasury Department!

The bill was passed without objection by the Senate and sent on to the House for its consideration. In the House, it was referred to its Committee on Banking and Currency. The bill was never reported out of the House Committee, however, and thus, as it was in the 1930s, the Committee was responsible for ending the medals initiative. I attribute the House Committee's resistance to the switch to medals as one designed to keep the options available to its members "open." As Representatives are elected by locally-aligned residents vs. statewide populations, I believe they wanted to keep every "arrow in their quiver" so as to be able to respond to local commemoration requests and keep their local constituents happy by introducing a commemorative coin bill regardless of potential negative results - a smaller world view, if you will.

Additional commemorative coin bills were introduced in the 80th Congress (1947-48) and beyond, but none were ultimately approved (the 1951 amendment to the Booker T. Washington (BTW) coin Act that resulted in the George Washington Carver - BTW Half Dollar being the lone exception). Even without defining legislation, medals did eventually take hold as they became the only viable pathway to get a US Mint-struck commemorative piece produced. Here's one example I had lying around:

1961 Pony Express Termination Medal - Silver
Commems-Collection-Classic:-Medals-Vs.-Coins---1947-Attempt Commems-Collection-Classic:-Medals-Vs.-Coins---1947-Attempt


For more on Congress' 1930s efforts to curb the proliferation of US commemorative coins, check out:

- Medals vs. Coins - 1930s
- Prohibiting Certain US Commemorative Coins
- Regulating US Commemorative Coins



For more of my topics on commemorative coins and medals, see: Commems Collection.




Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187582 Posts
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
NumisEd's Avatar
United States
5177 Posts
 Posted 11/08/2022  2:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add NumisEd to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Seems we have come full circle, with the explosion of commemoratives and other stuff coming from the US Mint.
I wonder if in say 10 years from now we again will see an outcry and people demand the Mint to only focus on circulating coinage.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187582 Posts
 Posted 11/08/2022  3:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I wonder if in say 10 years from now we again will see an outcry and people demand the Mint to only focus on circulating coinage.
Doubtful. No one cares about circulating coinage like they did in the past. In ten years there may be some who will suggest the entire shebang should be NCLT.
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15386 Posts
 Posted 11/08/2022  6:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Outstanding summary commems for which I am thankful for you sharing the research and knowledge.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,264Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to rattle this change. Forums