Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Commems Collection Classic: 1927 Battle Of Bennington, Vermont Indep. Sesquicentennial, Possibility

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,215Next Topic  
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12255 Posts
 Posted 03/03/2023  09:19 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
The 1927 Battle of Bennington / Vermont Independence Sesquicentennial Half Dollar is one of the classic-era US commemorative coin series that has a dual commemorative theme: 1) the Battle of Bennnington, and 2) Vermont Independence. (For a discussion of other "dual commemoratives," see: Quick Bits #81 - Dual Purpose Commemorative Coins.)

The original coin proposal for the Vermont events, introduced by Senator Frank Lester Greene (R-VT) in January 1925, called for two coins to commemorate the pair of anniversaries: a gold $1.00 coin and a silver $0.50 piece. (You can read more about the two-coin bill and its objectives here: What If? 1927 Gold $1 For Vermont-Battle Of Bennington 150th.)

Two events - two coins - it makes one think that the original intent of Senator Greene's bill might have been to secure two coins so that each one could be the focus for one of the anniversaries. A review of the bill, however, reveals that it does not include any language outlining such an objective. Such an omission wouldn't have precluded a two-coin / two-design / individual-focus scenario, however, as the design details were to be driven by the desires of the Vermont Sesqui-Centennial Commission, the coins' sponsor.

In any case, the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency removed the bill's provisions for a gold $1.00 coin during its review of Greene's bill and prior to a Hearing being held on the proposal. As such, during the Hearing on the coin bill, only the silver half dollar was discussed and recommended for passage.

It's certainly possible that, had the gold dollar coin been approved alongside the silver half dollar, the two coins would have followed the precedent of the 1922 Grant Centenary program and shared a common design. Who knows, a group of each may have also incorporated some device akin to the Grant's incuse star to create collectible varieties of the coins. Of course, it's also possible each of the coins would have incorporated its own distinct design but marked the same dual anniversaries.

With the Senate's removal of the gold $1.00 from the bill, we'll never know which of the three scenarios would have played out:

1. Two coins, two designs, separate commemoration on each;
2. Two coins, shared design, dual commemoration on each, or
3. Two coins, different designs, dual commemoration on each.

But nothing stops us from wondering!

My preference would have been #3 - a parallel to the 1926 American Independence Sesquicentennial gold and silver pair - two coins, two designs, same events commemorated on each.


1927 Battle of Bennington - Vermont Independence Sesquicentennial Half Dollar
Commems-Collection-Classic:-1927-Battle-Of-Bennington,-Vermont-Indep.-Sesquicentennial,-Possibility Commems-Collection-Classic:-1927-Battle-Of-Bennington,-Vermont-Indep.-Sesquicentennial,-Possibility


For other of my posts about commemorative coins and medals, including more What Bennington-Vermont stories, see: Commems Collection.




Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Edited by commems
03/03/2023 09:23 am
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15392 Posts
 Posted 03/03/2023  2:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Fun read @commems.

I believe I would have been in favor of the first combination you list; Two coins, two designs, separate commemoration on each.

The 50 cent piece could have honored the Battle of Bennington (as it was issued) and the gold $1 coin could have honored Vermont Independence anniversary.

Although I do acknowledge the beauty of the two coin 1926 Sesquicentennial issues. The gold $2.5 coin for that celebration is my favorite classic series gold design and will the first (and likely only) one I will acquire someday.

Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187702 Posts
 Posted 03/03/2023  3:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very interesting!

These two worthy commemorative topics probably deserved two coins.
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,215Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to rattle this change. Forums