Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop CCF Members on eBay! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Commems Collection Classic: 1946 Iowa Statehood Centennial - Pricing Justification

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 377Next Topic  
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12253 Posts
 Posted 10/25/2025  10:08 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
A few years back, I posted about the sales approach used for the 1946 Iowa Statehood Centennial Half Dollar (read it here: 1946 Iowa Statehood Centennial - Sales And Distribution). In-State residents were charged $2.50 per coin and out-of-state buyers being charged $3.00 per coin to cover postage and the additional handling; an initial limit of one coin per person was set though later lifted.

With this post, I'm offering a "Saturday Supplement" to discuss some reasons I found that were given for the 5x or 6x face value price being asked for the coins being viewed as reasonable. The Iowa Centennial Commission believed its higher-than-typical issue price for its coin was justified because:

1. Commemorative coins were highly prized by collectors.

2. The 1946 Iowa half dollar was the first US commemorative coin to be struck since 1939 (when the final issues of the Oregon Trail Memorial and Arkansas Statehood Centennial programs were minted).

3. The US Treasury was against the issue of commemorative coins and would likely continue such opposition regarding future coin proposals.

4. It took significant efforts by the coin's supporters to overcome the Treasury's roadblocks and get the coin minted.

5. With a mintage of "just" 100,000, the Iowa half dollar was considered to be in small enough supply to ensure that it would be viewed as a true collector's item.

1946 Iowa Statehood Centennial Half Dollar
Commems-Collection-Classic:-1946-Iowa-Statehood-Centennial---Pricing-Justification Commems-Collection-Classic:-1946-Iowa-Statehood-Centennial---Pricing-Justification

Ultimately, the Iowa Commission was able to distribute the coin's entire mintage via direct sales and its bank network, with no coins being returned to the Mint to be melted. It appears the Commission's pricing rationale was sound.


For other of my posts about commemorative coins and medals, including more about the Iowa half dollar, see: Commems Collection




Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15388 Posts
 Posted 10/25/2025  11:19 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Good backstory, thank you for sharing.

I recall reading somewhere that the State of Iowa still has a limited supply of these coins in their possession with intentions to distribute them during their 2046 bicentennial anniversary.

Is there any truth to this?

Given the 5x to 6x face value price it's somewhat surprising to me that the Iowa coin saw any circulation, let alone enough time in commerce to wear to my circulated set example:

1946 Iowa Statehood Centennial PCGS G06

Commems-Collection-Classic:-1946-Iowa-Statehood-Centennial---Pricing-Justification
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12253 Posts
 Posted 10/26/2025  08:19 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@nickelsearcher: Back in 2021, you posted a similar question:


Quote:
I recall reading that a portion of the Iowa Centennial Half mintage was intentionally held back from initial distribution, with intentions to distribute them at either the 150th or 200th anniversary.


My response then and now:

"I can confirm that a batch of original coins was made available to collectors in 1996 for the 150th. As far as coins for the 200th anniversary in 2046 goes, you'll have to wait and see! "

It's my understanding, however, that 500 coins were reserved for each milestone year.








Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94728 Posts
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15388 Posts
 Posted 10/27/2025  05:25 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
@nickelsearcher: Back in 2021, you posted a similar question:


I can barely remember what I had for lunch yesterday - and here you are remembering a minor question from 4 years ago. Amazing.

Thank you for the reminder on the answer. Set it aside, somewhere in 2029 I'll ask again.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187662 Posts
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 377Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to rattle this change. Forums