Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1891 CC Morgan Seems To Have Been Graded Low

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 206Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
66 Posts
 Posted 06/20/2026  5:42 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Steven49 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
*** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***

My latest purchase is this 1891 Morgan Carson City Silver dollar. It was graded as a MS-61 from PCGS. It is a "spitting eagle" variety. . I have was always told to purchase the coin , not the label. In this case, I believe it could have gotten a higher grade. Liberty's face shows very little contact marks.
What do you think?

1891-CC-Morgan-Seems-To-Have-Been-Graded-Low
1891-CC-Morgan-Seems-To-Have-Been-Graded-Low
1891-CC-Morgan-Seems-To-Have-Been-Graded-Low
1891-CC-Morgan-Seems-To-Have-Been-Graded-Low
1891-CC-Morgan-Seems-To-Have-Been-Graded-Low
1891-CC-Morgan-Seems-To-Have-Been-Graded-Low'nt
1891-CC-Morgan-Seems-To-Have-Been-Graded-Low
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
CoinForMe's Avatar
United States
2193 Posts
 Posted 06/20/2026  8:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CoinForMe to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree; I have seen MS-62/63 worse-looking than this.
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
74621 Posts
 Posted 06/20/2026  9:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't agree with the MS-61 grade. Looks a bit nicer than what they graded it at.
Errers and Varietys.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
97062 Posts
Valued Member
United States
52 Posts
 Posted 06/20/2026  10:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 1910S_1C to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Is it possible the coin has a minor problem which led the grading service to net it down? It looks like it could pass in a 64 holder, so I am left to wonder if the coin's strong eye appeal saved it from getting a details grade. All that being said, I don't see any problems at first glance.
Pillar of the Community
United States
889 Posts
 Posted 06/20/2026  11:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add adam126402 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I see a lot of marks in the obverse fields and in the 3rd photo reveals many more hits on the jaw and cheek. They all look minor, but a lot of them. I don't see this beyond 62.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
panzaldi's Avatar
United States
18685 Posts
 Posted 06/21/2026  10:40 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add panzaldi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
the full coin photos have too much glare from overhead light. the remaining photos seem to show what the coin actually looks like in hand. i'd like to see a full straight on shot, no overhead light to see the surfaces.

i'd say PCGS messed up again. imo w/o better full shot photos, i'd call her MS62
Bedrock of the Community
IndianGoldEagle's Avatar
United States
36828 Posts
 Posted 06/22/2026  09:11 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add IndianGoldEagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Dull luster, lots of surface hairlines and rub spots, MS-61 seems correct.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
panzaldi's Avatar
United States
18685 Posts
 Posted 06/23/2026  11:17 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add panzaldi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
taking another look at the later photos I agree with IGE that those photos are showing a lack of luster. there is also a palm or finger print on the obv at K9 which doesn't really affect grade but it does for value.
Pillar of the Community
ericgreen's Avatar
United States
1518 Posts
 Posted 06/23/2026  1:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ericgreen to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think IGE is exactly right. The luster and hairlines hold it back.
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 206Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to rattle this change. Forums