| Author |
 Replies: 50 / Views: 9,073 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2150 Posts |
It has been discussed on my Lincoln Dansco thread. One member contacted them but they said there was probably a 200 or something minimum.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
55 Posts |
Wow! That's crazy! But it would still be cool!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189222 Posts |
About fifteen years ago I ordered some replacement binders for my oldest Dansco albums. The man I spoke with on the phone said it would be no problem. He gave me a price, told me to write down what I wanted and send a check to pay for it.
While I had him on the phone, I asked him about printing custom pages. He said that they could do almost anything that I wanted, as long as I was willing to pay for it. No mention was made of a minimum, but I can imagine that volume discounts would apply.
Things may have changed by now. It should be noted that this was a casual conversation to satisfy my curiosity. I had no serious intentions of having the pages made.
My mother always said "It never hurts to ask. The worst they can do is say no."
Dansco Corporation
(323) 734-6373
4313 W Jefferson Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90016
|
|
New Member
United States
41 Posts |
love your set. think about starting the roosevelt set from 1946-1964.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
Quote:
love your set. think about starting the roosevelt set from 1946-1964 Thanks, those were my intentions at first but I just kept going and going,,,,,, |
|
New Member
United States
20 Posts |
i have 62-D I found today and 64-D and P and all clad up to 2008.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
Are all Dansco Roosevelt albums like that?
I see they put the plain (P) first then the D (Denver), except for 1963. The D comes first?
Forgot to say ... very nice looking set
Edited by GR58
05/01/2010 11:00 pm
|
|
Moderator
United States
189222 Posts |
I just noticed that. Very odd.
My Roosevelt Dansco has 1963 in the correct order. But mine is the 7125 (The one without proofs; I put all of my proofs on a separate page that I added later).
|
|
Valued Member
United States
51 Posts |
im finishing up my linciolns the dimes are next
|
|
Valued Member
United States
497 Posts |
the 1958 was great looking!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
127 Posts |
Everyone says the dansco albums are so awesome and then they procede to complain about them!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
Quote:
Everyone says the dansco albums are so awesome and then they procede to complain about them! Well, I think they are the better of whats available. Make a custom one with the holes I want and I would buy it from you. |
|
Moderator
United States
189222 Posts |
Quote:
Everyone says the dansco albums are so awesome and then they procede to complain about them! I am not really complaining. I am stating that I would rather not have to buy the 1922-D Plain for my album.  However, the inclusion of that variety and typographical errors are not unique to Dansco. And Whitman expects us to buy some of the more popular doubled die varieties. Now that would cause me to complain!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2120 Posts |
1 - "hey Perry, you think if we add slots for well known varieties people will try to fill them, even though it's near impossible to get them?" 2 - "yea sure." 1 - "you don't think that will drive anyone crazy, do you?" 2 - "crazier than they already are? Nah." Edited by Namachieli
10/11/2010 3:49 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
98 Posts |
What's wrong with Roosevelt's face on the 61p? It looks like there's a big gouge out of his cheek; he looks like Two-face or something.
|
| |
Replies: 50 / Views: 9,073 |
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 02/18/2010 8:56 pm
