Realeswatcher
I fear you have misunderstood my post. I never implied that this coin or any other coin would ever have no value, merely that I could not guess at a value for this particular coin which is what the original poster was asking. At some point the discount for damage will outweigh the damage in someone's eyes and the that is the value point for that collector. On this particular coin, at the $50 paid by Archraz, I would have bought the coin if for no other reason than it represents a great value, not because I want it for my type or date set. At $100 I would have passed. So is the price point $50? $60? $70? I am certainly not going to guess because every collector has different thresholds.
As for my being a coin snob as you imply, I have to laugh. I assure you there are many coins in my collection that would be honored to achieve anything above "cull" status. I just personally will hold out for a better example now that I am older and willing to postpone the joy of ownership longer than I did when I started collecting. I am not knocking anyone else, there is a collector out there for every coin, I just have my own goals and my own approach. My entire Dansco
US Large Cent album is made up of very low grade coins, all of which were pulled out of dealer junk coin bins and $2 and $3 Jars (do those even exist at local coin stores anymore, those were always fun to look through.). I have salvaged 8 reales that wish they were as nice as the typical Cazador piece that looks like it was rescued from the murky depths only to be tortured without mercy in an attempt at "conservation". (Are you familiar with the salvage diver term "a razor"?)
So let us settle this by acknowledging "yes" you are correct, this coin has value, more to some people than others but it is not a coin I am going to guess a value on. But please do not attempt to brand someone a coin snob when you know little about their collection as a whole.