| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,000 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
166 Posts |
This half is graded PCGS 45. In my opinion, this coin was cleaned once, and has retoned, either naturally, or otherwise. I am not sure though, I am stumped on this one! It appears there is a fingerprint at 10 o'clock on the obverse. Any opinions on this piece (pro or con) would be most appreciated.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Probably has been clened, but it is market-acceptable. I'm closer to EF-40, though.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Yeah, 40 sounds better to me too. An old, light cleaning is almost always market acceptable these days. My overall opinion of it as a 45 would be below average for the grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree EF-40 and most attractive, once cleaned or not.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
I think it slabs as original.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1353 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
431 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1339 Posts |
Great looking coin, would buy this coin,as would most!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts |
That's a nice coin, nice look. Sometimes a finger print can tone on the coin, people didn't wash hands much back then. Most places didn't even have running water.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
166 Posts |
Thank you all for taking the time to reply. It is unanimous that the coin is at XF40, and that the surfaces are not cleaned, at least recently and/or obviously. Looking past the gradeflation, I think the surfaces are very pleasing, and I am going to go for it. I am trying to train myself to distinguish between original/natural surfaces and "doctored" surfaces. It is difficult at times, I am grateful for the guidance found on this site.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,000 |
|