| Author |
Replies: 37 / Views: 22,413 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5205 Posts |
I was at a coin show last weekend and saw 3 of these for sale.
I remembered Commems post and was almost ready to buy but forgot if the thick or thin was better and had no idea as to values.
There was a "thin" circulated for $70, another lightly circulated (not sure if thick or thin" for $170, and a PCGS slabbed thick for I didn't even bother to ask.
Does anyone know the thickness of the thin and the thick?
I can't find any numbers online and there is another local show in a week so I hope the seller with the $70 thin will be there as I will be picking it up if he still has it.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
469 Posts |
How circulated was the thin one?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5205 Posts |
Quote: How circulated was the thin one? I was ready to say VERY circulated but looking at pictures online of slabbed examples I would have to say EF. Even MS examples look like they have flat details.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1751 Posts |
I thoroughly enjoy these posts with the histories of the coins!! To me it's what coin collecting is all about. @ Commens you must have a very vast collection, as you've got coins from several different countries.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
921 Posts |
First I've heard of these. Beautiful medals. There are actually quite a few of the silver, thick and thin, for sale on ebay.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
217 Posts |
Even though this is a bit older, I have to say another great post by Commems (and what a jaw dropping coin that gold piece is!)
One question that comes to mind is why were the bronze pieces struck, or at least why they were struck in such small numbers? Who silver plated them outside the mint and why?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5205 Posts |
Can anyone verify the thickness of the 2? I asked a sell on ebay who is selling a "thin" and he said the thin is 1mm (thinner than a dime) and the thick is 2mm (which would be a little thicker than a quarter)
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
  United States
12263 Posts |
Quote: Can anyone verify the thickness of the 2? I've measured a raw "Thin" that I had handy and got measurements in the range of 1.35mm to 1.50mm depending on which side I measured (at the edge). If I recall correctly, the "Thick" medals are about 2.0mm in thickness. (I didn't have one immediately available to measure.) I'll update as possible.
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5205 Posts |
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
  United States
12263 Posts |
I measured a raw "Thick" medal and once again found variable measurements. This time the edge thickness varied from 2.25mm to 2.60mm.
Hope this helps.
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2543 Posts |
Wow, I just came across this thread this evening. I had never seen one of these until this morning at an auction I was following. It was a thick one. They called it an MS 63 commerative . They didn't call it medal or a coin. They valued it at $500, it went for $210. It really caught my eye, I wish now I had the expendable cash.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5205 Posts |
Unfortunately the seller I saw at the last show with the circulated thin one was not at the show this weekend.
I will definitely be on the lookout in the future.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
469 Posts |
This Norse design would have made a great commem half dollar. It appears that a lot of these medals were used as pocketpieces. More so than a lot of other medals.
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
  United States
12263 Posts |
Quote: This Norse design would have made a great commem half dollar. As originally conceived, the Norse-American medal was going to be a commemorative 50-cent piece. Before the appropriate bill was introduced, however, the Treasury Department was consulted. The TD objected to the proposed coin bill, but let it be known that it would not object to a medal bill. So as not to risk losing out entirely, the Norse-American Centennial organization agreed to accept a medal instead of a coin. The bill proposing a medal was introduced in the Senate and moved smoothly through approval. This strong connection to the commemorative coins of the time is the biggest reason why it remains as popular as it does with today's US commemorative collectors.
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5205 Posts |
If anyone is going to the ANA show in Chicago tomorrow there is a seminar starting at 3PM "Norse American Centennial Medals of 1925: An Update on those "Thick and Thins" and more" I saw a sellers booth there today that had quite a collection of Norse medals and other memorabilia and guess that he will be doing the presentation. http://worldsfairofmoney.com/schedule.aspx
Edited by jack jeckel 08/07/2014 11:30 pm
|
| |
Replies: 37 / Views: 22,413 |