| Author |
Replies: 47 / Views: 5,395 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
729 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
I like your pictures better than the first set. I think it's pretty neat that you have a receipt from THE Q. David Bowers. Wonder if you could get him to grade the coin and then show him the receipt. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2540 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1704 Posts |
Gorgeous toning  and would probably grade at least MS-65 by today's standards. I don't actively collect Morgan dollars but I wouldn't mind owning this one especially with the Bowers and Ruddy receipt. 1880 was one of the few early years of the Morgan dollar series that the San Francisco Mint got everything just right and produced some of their best quality coins. Ed ANA LM-3175
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4132 Posts |
The toning makes the coin look more marked than it is, but the angle shots make it clear that it's not very marked up at all. I think MS65 is quite possible.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36828 Posts |
I think it's an MS-66 and you might get a plus for the tone. What looked like bag marks in your early photos actually looks more like streaked toning now. Great coin!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Idle question, epikur - do you have the ability to get detailed close-ups? If so, could you shoot and post the date?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3755 Posts |
Put me in the 65 boat. BEAUTIFUL coin. Far from common IMO and certainly a higher end MS coin.
When you say photos to support the connection, what do you mean? Photos of that exact coin in the hands of an employee of the establishment? It was toned like that then?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
I wouldn't pay above MS64 on this, it wouldn't pass muster as MS65. This coin is known for super clean surfaces, sharp strike, and frost, and super luster. CONDER- I stand by what I said in my previous post. We were using the term MS65 in 1975 and so was the Grey Sheet, possibly a year or so before.. A coin graded MS65 back in those days was flawless, I was there. A MS67 then would have had to be a super coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
The inference from Conder101's post is that this coin cannot be the item described in the invoice.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: The inference from Conder101's post is that this coin cannot be the item described in the invoice. Quote: If this is the grade "MS67" that Bowers attached, it shows a basic disregard for his customers during the time he was making a name for himself I'm obviously not in Conder's head, but I don't think that was what he was implying. The simple fact that MS67 was not an "official" grade in 1978 doesn't indicate much on its' own. The "Powers that Be" in numismatics were just as conservative then as they are now, and change came slowly. And if there were any man alive who would have been on the leading edge of the envelope, Bowers would have been that man. Keep in mind: by 1978, Bowers and Ruddy had already built their second hugely-successful coin business. The first, Empire Coin Co., was sold to Paramount in 1965. Note the connection. After that, he took a few years' break to pursue his other passion, automatic musical instruments, with Terry Hathaway. They formed a large-scale reseller of music boxes. Then in 1970 (IIRC) Bowers teamed up again with Ruddy (who took that time off to research and publish Photograde, a book you might be familiar with) to form Bowers & Ruddy Galleries. That firm was one of the standouts of the time, handling many of the most important collection liquidations of the day including the Garrett Collection. In 1978, Bowers was President of PNG, and he'd already earned from his alma mater - Penn State - their Alumni Achievement Award. I don't think he had much left to prove by then. A written statement from the seller of this coin indicating that he was the original purchaser would likely suffice to verify provenance. I have no trouble believing either A) If anyone in that time were assigning MS67 as a "tweener" grade, Q. David Bowers would be that man, and B) The coin indicated here would easily qualify for that description, in context. Where did "MS65" fit against our perceptions of today? We couldn't agree as to what "MS65" is today, much less figure out what it was in 1978. Heck, for that matter, was the toning that well-developed 34 years ago? I kinda doubt it. It's unlikely this provenance would ever be anything but a neat footnote, but it would be cool to have.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3755 Posts |
Exactly my point on the receipt SD. Cool to have, but really difficult to prove it belongs with this coin. Quote: A coin graded MS65 back in those days was flawless, Huh. Wouldnt flawless be MS70? Or perhaps standards have deteriorated so far that the scale had five more grades added. And it had to be graded walking uphill both ways in the snow...with no shoes on...and holes in their socks. That is a 65 and I dont care what they did or did not do back when. A wonderful coin and might even be a 66 in hand.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
 and 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: Huh. Wouldnt flawless be MS70? Or perhaps standards have deteriorated so far that the scale had five more grades added. And it had to be graded walking uphill both ways in the snow...with no shoes on...and holes in their socks.
Lol that is what we would call romanticizing the past
|
| |
Replies: 47 / Views: 5,395 |