All three of these casts could be 200+ years old, maybe even older, this can be seen from the dates mentioned in the provenience quotes, assuming its not 'spin'.
If they are Paduan they have interest and value associated with them, sadly what they are not is 2000 years old.
I too would love to know what the seller of the 'O' has to say about it, I would have avoided this coin even if I had not seen the other two as the stamp simply does not look correct. I would struggle to condemn the other two coins on their own, together its obvious but apart and on their own it would be hard to be definitive.
Keep us posted on what the seller says Dionysos, good thread for experience hopefully you wont end up out of pocket if you want to return the coin.
Quote:
(with a pedigree going back to 1892)
(with a pedigree going back to 1892)
If they are Paduan they have interest and value associated with them, sadly what they are not is 2000 years old.
I too would love to know what the seller of the 'O' has to say about it, I would have avoided this coin even if I had not seen the other two as the stamp simply does not look correct. I would struggle to condemn the other two coins on their own, together its obvious but apart and on their own it would be hard to be definitive.
Keep us posted on what the seller says Dionysos, good thread for experience hopefully you wont end up out of pocket if you want to return the coin.























