Elbesaar,
Your 1895-O AU-58 Dime passed through Heritage Auctions in August 2011, Lot #3623, as did mine in June of 2004, Lot #8073
I did not buy mine from Heritage. Did you?
My reason for asking is that I would want to include your example in an upcoming article for the BCCS Journal.
In short, it has to due with a certain wear pattern on the reverse that is ignored in every coin grading guide.
I will seek out examples from other members who have contributed to this topic.
To appear in our Journal, permission is needed from the owner of the pictures.
Thanking you in advance.
Previously posted in this topic:
... I will eventually post a follow-up to my article re: 1895-O Dime.
I had to vindicate myself for buying it. Not one but two dealers said that it may have been cleaned. When I discovered the reason for their
"confusion" I wrote another article in the BCCS Journal which, in effect, said:
"TRUST YOUR OWN JUDGEMENT!"
My experience led me to the conclusion that there exists a certain wear pattern on the reverse of the dime which can be mistaken for cleaning.
I just need to gather up some visuals to present my case. Pretty sure that I am correct, though.
The original article:
The following article was first published in
The Journal of the
Barber Coin Collectors' Society
Volume 23 Number 1
2012
Matthew

Edited by matthewvincent
12/04/2012 6:21 pm