| Author |
Replies: 200 / Views: 30,125 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6768 Posts |
Thanks Pixu and Koin Hunter for sharing.
Yes, 2005 Pole is great artwork on the coin. If not being .925 Silver, I would by it years ago. But now just waited for such quiet month as May, to buy this coin (specially when 2013 moon Mask came out)
|
|
Valued Member
Switzerland
144 Posts |
I tried to take a picture of the 2010 Sun... I hope you again like it - I do  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1528 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
154 Posts |
ive wanted this coin since 2010 but as of late I haven't found many on ebay ! :(
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
95 Posts |
Just received my Moon Mask coin today.Ordered the coin from the Post Office on April 15 and got it today.Looks real nice.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
593 Posts |
Got mine yesterday from the mint and I'm also surprise,looks better in hand than on pics.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
329 Posts |
i cracked the black lining of the clamshell trying to get the coin out. it was jammed in there and I couldn't get it out at all. atleast the coin and seal is still good.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6768 Posts |
Just curios, when the Mint will publish the info about real mintage of this coin?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3690 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2408 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
814 Posts |
is it just me or is there something seriously wrong with some of the data on that report?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3690 Posts |
The sales data (aka 'mintages') appears more complete than in previous annual reports but they really don't report cumulative sales of individual coins very well. That is, the report is only sales occurring between Jan and Dec 31 but that doesn't account for coins that sell in two or more fiscal years. To be fair, this a fiscal report, not a production report, but of course most of us really want to see true final mintages.
It would be an exercise in aggregating coins sales for a couple of years to get better mintage numbers for individual coins but I think this is the first year that data has been so detailed.
add: actually last year looks pretty detailed too.
Solidifier, is there anything in particular that you feel is wrong?
Edited by CC-Ottawa 05/11/2014 11:11 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6768 Posts |
Thanks for the URL, CC-Ottawa!
For some reason, I thought, that the reports will be issued later...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
814 Posts |
this was one thing I noticed.......the tiktaalik was 2104 and the other one (cant remember the name isn't in there)
Prehistoric Animals â€" Quetzalcoatlus 25-cent Coloured Coin (2013) 29,991 Prehistoric Animals â€" Tiktaalik 25-cent Coloured Coin (2012) 561 Prehistoric Animals â€" Tylosaurus Pembinensis 25-cent Coloured (2013) 29,458
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3690 Posts |
Tiktaalik wasn't issued until Feb 2014 so I guess that is a small error and should be Pachyrhinosaurus lakustai (2012) 561.
Adding to the 2012 report number of 24422, that give 24983 of 25000 for the first GITD. Makes sense.
Maybe we need a thread to point out these errors.
Edited by CC-Ottawa 05/12/2014 12:14 pm
|
| |
Replies: 200 / Views: 30,125 |