| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 2,393 |
|
Valued Member
United States
457 Posts |
I was thinking maybe AU, but I'm certainly not the expert at grading so I thought your opinions may be more accurate. If you need better pics, just ask, it looks like in the preview that I could reduce the size and get a higher quality image. Mark   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
I think you've got it right, but it's apparent lack of luster has me wondering if it's been cleaned. I'll say AU53 with a possible "details" annotation.
Colligo ergo sum
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36905 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
South Africa
453 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
Very slight wear. I concur at AU-55.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2368 Posts |
It might just be the lighting, but when I first saw the pics I thought "cleaned". AU-55 possible details.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
457 Posts |
I can see what you mean wheatchaser. The coin doesn't look cleaned in person, but it does a little bit in the picture. Thanks for the input guys.
Mark
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
506 Posts |
If you have a smartphone, you should try PCGS's app Photograde. Great reference for grading any coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
968 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
506 Posts |
I might be missing something here but I think it is around MS 63 (according to TPG standards). Anyone care to inform me what I am missing here? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
I don't see wear from that picture. Looks like a low Ms.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
416 Posts |
also see this as MS but I think the lighting is too distorting to give a number
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
It's just the lighting, you can see the cartwheel effect, MS64 for me
|
|
Valued Member
440 Posts |
Yup I'll betcha this was shot in natural daylight causing the gunmetal look. 63
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
Based on the better photos now posted, I can see just a hint of wear to the hair above the ears and the top of the cap, as well as minimally on the eagle's breast. I still don't like the look of the surfaces, and the apparent lack of any marks. I'll come up to AU58, but I still think it'd go "details" if submitted for certification.
Colligo ergo sum
|
| |
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,393 |
Posted 08/25/2014 11:30 am
