| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,472 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
245 Posts |
|
|
|
|
CCF Sponsor
United States
702 Posts |
I'd go 61 over 63 on the Morgan, and ... well, it could be the lighting, but the Walker looks AU to me from here. Nice coins for sure though! What a gift!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18715 Posts |
I agree. 61/63 on the Morgan. AU58 on the walker
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2368 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
The Morgan looks low MS to me, 60/61
The walker in my opinion is MS-63,still has the mint bloom center obverse.
|
|
Valued Member
167 Posts |
62 on the Morgan, 63 on the Walker.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
The Morgan is too close for me to want to call from images. The obverse worries me more than the reverse, but both faces show marks that seem to be consistent with circulation.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1215 Posts |
The morgan looks AU because of all those wear marks, especially on the high parts. I'm calling it an AU58
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
I think BU is generally a 63 grade. The Morgan to me looks AU 58 and I can't tell on the walker.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
The Morgan looks AU to me, and the Walker might get a 62.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36900 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1511 Posts |
I'm definitely at AU for the Morgan. The marks on obverse of the Morgan are consistent with circulation. The "wear" above the ear and elsewhere doesn't bother me, looks more of a weak strike... But the hits and dings don't look like I'd expect from bag marks... But rather light circulation.
For the walker I'm on the fence between AU-58-Low MS... Slider maybe?
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,472 |
|
Posted 12/16/2014 8:10 pm
