| Author |
Replies: 76 / Views: 8,143 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3644 Posts |
And actually being as mike mentioned the additional raised and incuse designs on each side means this entire event would have had to happened more than once and the additional cents would have had to again flip and land perfectly on top of this cent before again being struck...just unreal
|
|
Pillar of the Community
613 Posts |
We are Monkeys that type on Computers,that's unreal.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
yes that is how we see pennies like this one and get educated. yup, I do four boxes a month and keep anything unusual valuable or not. in it for fun but make a dollar here and there too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1249 Posts |
Well one way to settle this would be to get it graded. Only way I see an end to it and to have a definitive answer. I myself just for peace of mind would get it graded. Mike I see what your saying if you take 2 pennies and smash them together you will have incuse designs If you use that penny as your actual die on your dowel. But with what I see as far as where the date lies that if this where a counterfeit the would have had to make 2 dies anyway in order to get the incuse date to change locations like it does compared to the devices on the strike through. So saying that they would have to make 2 dies. one with penny where the smashed an obverse into a reverse and one where they smashed a obverse into an obverse. and that is just to make the die's then they would have had to use those two dies to smash the penny in question into what we see. I would use a blank piece of and make 2 dies from coins I smashed into the blanks. then make the blanks my dies on the end of dowels. you would then press your dies into one on each side of coin obverse to revers and revers to obvers. done we then have a struck through cent. I'm just saying the probability of either or is slim to none I'd get it graded
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
621 Posts |
Tweak , mike is considered one of the foremost experts on errors in the world. He's on a level where the graders would come to him for advice if they were uncertain.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Yeah, I'm a bit curious how you folks can call yourself committed collectors and not know who Mike Diamond is.
If anything, though, it's even more mystifying that you choose to be so closed-minded about something with which you are so entirely wrong. You're speculating; we've seen hundreds of these over the years.
Take a chunk of aluminum. Lesser grades have a Mohs hardness the same as copper. You can drive the details of a Cent into that aluminum if you get a good swing, and the result will be a die strong enough to impart details onto another Cent. What it won't be, though, is flat. The coin is still round, and still has a rim. That means the last time it was in a Mint press, the collar was in place to keep the coin's shape. If it's in the collar, whatever hits the coin has 150 tons of hardened steel slamming onto it.
You can bend a Cent with pliers in each hand. How will that stay bent under 150 tons?
I can't allow you people to spread misinformation. We cater to new collectors at Coin Community, and you're not going to mislead them.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189340 Posts |
Quote: It kinda crushes me to hear something I've kept all these years, since I was a child..called a laughable fake. You still have something worth keeping. It is a sentimental piece and a lesson learned.  to the Community!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1249 Posts |
OK Who said I don't know who Mike is? He is still human and we all make errors. I AM speculating a situation that may or may not have happened. Instead of attacking members personally calling them close minded and such. You should act more appropriately being a moderator. It is simply an opinion. I am not trying to mislead anyone. Simply looking for answers.
Edited by tweak800 03/16/2015 11:06 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
830 Posts |
I don't know enough about this type of error to make a judgment, But I don't like the way this thread is going. There is no need to insult a new member who just wanted an answer on a coin.
hnyluk Welcome to the community
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2651 Posts |
Lively discussion here...Thanks for sharing the coin with us.
Interesting coin for sure. I noticed the incuse features and decided not to comment on this coin the first time I saw it because I didn't want to say if it was an error or not cause I truly didn't know. With the explanation we have gotten from Mike it becomes clear that this coin would be impossible to make at the mint.
What to do now? I would suggest put it in a 2x2 and keep it. You could send it in to PCGS but just be ready for it to comeback not genuine and spending the money to do so.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: OK Who said I don't know who Mike is? He is still human and we all make errors. I AM speculating a situation that may or may not have happened. Instead of attacking members personally calling them close minded and such. You should act more appropriately being a moderator. It is simply an opinion. I am not trying to mislead anyone. Simply looking for answers. Nobody's saying Mike is perfect. I've disagreed with him publicly in this forum. He was probably right, though.  You are getting pushback because your position is untenable. You are supporting a theory which does not stand up to casual numismatic diligence, for reasons which ought to be among the earliest knowledge gathered by every collector - an understanding of the minting process. This is fundamental, and when you know it you'll know this coin isn't possible from the Mint. I'm sorry you feel it's personal. It isn't. The people arguing in favor of this coin being a legit Mint error are doing the equivalent of claiming the sun rises in the West, but in this case there is a large audience reading who don't yet know which direction the sun rises. My job is to protect them. I'm known in this place to question conventional wisdom, especially in Moderns. Rest assured, if there were the slightest doubt in my mind about this coin, you'd know it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2543 Posts |
I think what people need to realize is that the OP quite often gets gets left behind in a forum like this. The discussion/debate becomes less about the OP and more about the coin/question at hand. One cannot relate every comment, every opinion to the OP. The debate evolves into something more between the members and less between the members and the OP. I don't think the OP was mistreated at all, I think that at this point the discussion has evolved beyond him, and he needs to just sit back and take in the debate. And realize we are debating the coin and not him. Hope he realizes that and does not take what is said about his coin, as being about him or his posting of such. I think that we also must realize that this being the #1 coin collecting site on the internet, there is a mixture of new collectors, 1-2 year collectors, life long collectors and even experts in various fields of numismatics. All have opinions worth listening to, some backed by more knowledge and experience than others, but all worth listening to. After all, this is what this forum is all about, right? And finally, if Mike says it is a fake error, that is all I need to hear to form my opinion. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Here is an example of a flip over nickel: 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 76 / Views: 8,143 |