| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,531 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Germany
1849 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
A tough one for me: I'll go with AU-55.
(Could be an MS coin, but I'm going conservative!)
|
|
Valued Member
United States
449 Posts |
There does appear to be something in the date. Also, the reverse is clashed. I am not familiar with this variety so we will have to wait for someone else to chime in. Nice coin by the way!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1094 Posts |
I'll say AU-58, really can't see much if any wear. Love the toning
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36826 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
Hard to call, I think there is wear, AU-56.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I have to default to the above opinions even though evidence exists that much of what we see is an artifact of strike and not wear. For instance, note the "wear" disparity of the upper left of the reverse wreath vs. the upper right.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18684 Posts |
I'm gonna say AU55 with a slightly weak reverse strike. Low MS is a possibility. This is a tough one
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
It appears "grainy" or porous to me, it may be the imaging, but I would give it an AU details.  I have been wrong before. I love the variety though! 
Edited by oih82w8 04/21/2015 10:07 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
I'd say AU58. A great variety!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6394 Posts |
I'm at AU, but not high AU. I see slight loss of detail on the breast and thigh which I don't think is just due to weak strike. There are obvious signs of friction in the left obverse field and around Half Dime on the reverse. Luster persists around the reverse legends but not so much on the obverse. I'd say AU-50 conservatively with a shot at AU-53. I've never inspected this variety in person but it certainly seems to be the real deal based on these images. Nice!
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,531 |
|