Not sure which pic shows the more-or-less correct color. I can only assume there must be considerable surface marks under the toning for this to merit only a 62. The difference in vvalue between 62FH and 63FH probably doesn't justify resubmitting it.
My grade is MS63FH. The break in luster on the knee/leg is what gives it 63 and not 64. I think NGC was alittle conservative on this one. Beautiful SLQ type 1 btw!
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use