1882-O Morgan Grade Opinions - Coin Community Forum

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Author	Replies: 10 / Views: 1,184
1916 D Merc Valued Member United States 459 Posts	Posted 09/12/2015 4:12 pm I purchased this one from my LCS today, I was wondering opinions on the grade and if it would be worth it to submit to PCGS or NGC. There are those few slight scrapes/hairlines on the cheek and they are not as noticeable as they appear in the pics. I included those to show some flaws. I feel like I may have gotten a good deal on this, if you would please include what you think this is worth. Thank you! Report this Post to the Staff

mcanniz Valued Member United States 486 Posts	Posted 09/12/2015 4:20 pm id go with MS62/63, due to the contact marks and the streaking in the fields. I'm always nervous though when making the first post because I'm not much of a grader. we'll see what the pros say Report this Post to the Staff
Coinfrog Bedrock of the Community United States 94367 Posts	Posted 09/12/2015 4:36 pm I's probably a 63 or even a 64, but it's such a common date that I wouldn't submit it, especially with those strange fingerprint-like marks. Report this Post to the Staff
CartwheelCollector Valued Member United States 403 Posts	Posted 09/12/2015 4:45 pm MS63+, not worth submitting. Report this Post to the Staff
Imthealphaomega Pillar of the Community United States 3210 Posts	Posted 09/12/2015 4:47 pm 1882o is a common date really not worth sending in unless it's a 65 andnup Report this Post to the Staff
Slider23 Pillar of the Community United States 4469 Posts	Posted 09/12/2015 5:14 pm MS63 The coin does have some strange lines in the obverse field that carry over onto the hair bun. I also see some of the same type of lines on the reverse. The lines do not appear to be a finger print, die polish or cleaning. Report this Post to the Staff
ChildOfTheWheat Pillar of the Community United States 5828 Posts	Posted 09/12/2015 5:17 pm MS-63, but that fingerprint kills it for me... Well, not really but it hurts the eye appeal/value. Report this Post to the Staff
IndianGoldEagle Bedrock of the Community United States 36832 Posts	Posted 09/12/2015 7:57 pm MS-63 Report this Post to the Staff
Jim_Shorts01 Valued Member United States 73 Posts	Posted 09/12/2015 8:15 pm if it wasn't for the streaking, I would have said those were two totally different coins in pic 1 & 2. Amazing how viewing the coin at even a slightly different angle could reveal flaws. Report this Post to the Staff
paralyse Bedrock of the Community United States 12057 Posts	Posted 09/12/2015 9:02 pm I agree with MS63. It looks too large to be a fingerprint. Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis Report this Post to the Staff
CoinCollector2012 Pillar of the Community United States 8137 Posts	Posted 09/13/2015 5:27 pm MS-63 Report this Post to the Staff
	Replies: 10 / Views: 1,184

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

All Forums Category: US Coins and Currency Forums Forum: US Classic and Colonial Coin Grading

Silver Gold Bull US is the United States leading bullion dealer. We deliver gold coins, gold bars, silver coins, silver bars and precious metals to your door. Order today!

The First Dollar, your premier source for bullion and rare coins. See our bullion list on the site and the coin inventory on ebay.

View Last 100 New Topics

View Last 100 Active Topics

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum

It took 0.27 seconds to rattle this change.