Quote:
Question is did you alert the new buyer of the defect before selling it? If not then shame on you.
Quote:
So you stuck someone else with a damaged coin without disclosing it and now want to make sure they can't get their money back out of it? Not terribly sporting of you.

You know, I have been watching this thread since its beginning... the real issue here is ICCS assigning a grade to a problem coin, or "net grading" it. This whole thread should have ended with Pokermandude's excellent post on page one.
Your scorning comments are addressed to a young numismatist (whom I have met and dealt with) selling a coin to a dealer. I have NEVER, at ANY show, have a dealer disclose issues with me when viewing coins with potential problems (especially when ICCS has graded it without issue). Usually, they want to debate with me, and state that, "Nothing is wrong with the coin, and the ICCS holder proves it." In this hobby, it is the responsibility of the buyer to scrutinize the coin (and not the holder). That is why we stress so much about learning how to examine coins that have been tampered with, and learning out to grade yourself. I have sold problem coins both raw (labelled as having problems) as well as NGC and PCGS "details" holders at deep discounts out of my "Junk Bin", only to see the same coins reappear comment-free in ICCS holders at a future dealers table... do you really think the seller/dealer in those cases cares about being "sporting"?
This young man is a exemplary collector, and brought the attention of a problem coin, otherwise not labelled, to other collectors, who may purchase ICCS coins sight unseen. Nothing more. Take your witch hunt elsewhere.

"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy
eBay store