Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

The 1888/7 Snow-1 Indian Cent

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 5,939Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
Mike1487's Avatar
United States
709 Posts
 Posted 07/15/2017  01:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Mike1487 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I've been meaning to provide an update on the submission. I wanted to give PCGS credit where it is due and say that they did ultimately refund me enough to cover most of the resubmission. But it was definitely not an easy process. First, here's the proof that I'm not just making this up.

Here's all five coins after the first submission, unattributed:
The-1888/7-Snow-1-Indian-Cent
The-1888/7-Snow-1-Indian-Cent
The-1888/7-Snow-1-Indian-Cent
The-1888/7-Snow-1-Indian-Cent
The-1888/7-Snow-1-Indian-Cent

I believe first I sent an email to customer service explaining the situation, and attached images of every coin slab and closeups in a zip file. I waited a month and got no response. I may have sent a second email as well.

Then I decided to call customer service (reluctantly). After taking a good 2-3 minutes of long-winded explanation, their reply was "Wait, what were you asking about?". Ughh. They checked their database and told me what I already knew. I said can I email pictures to support my case? "Yes." Ok, now I already did this twice and sent a zip folder with pictures, is this OK? "No, the zip file won't work, we will not receive the email." Great, how nice of you to tell me this after I had to specifically ask, I was suspicious of something like this.

I ended up sending another email, this time with about 18 photo attachments. They never got this either, so I'm not sure how exactly you are supposed to send images to them if there is a problem with a submission?

By this point, it was getting close to the next coin show, so I decided to drop them off in person. I explained the situation to them, printed out the pictures to submit along with it, and it was resubmitted as a reholder with two variety attributions (three are major varieties so there is no fee). They also put a shipping hold on the order so I can actually review it this time instead of them shipping it out before I knew something was wrong.

I get the grading results online, the two 1888 S-2's were now properly attributed. However, the two Double LIBERTY's and the 1888/7 were STILL slabbed as regular coins. You've got to be kidding me. I call them up, and they tell me the graders didn't agree with my assessment. They were also very condescending saying "well you know the population of the 1888/7 is only 4 in that grade..(so fat chance bud!)" I said did you look at the printout of pictures I included with the submission? "OK, we'll take a look and let you know, I can't guarantee what they will say. I will call you back." Never got a call back. However, a few days later, the three coins were correctly attributed (third time's a charm! )

I called them back to remove the shipping hold, and then tried to make the case that I should be reimbursed for having to resubmit these when I was right all along. They tried to get a hold of a manager to see what they could do. Unfortunately for me, I called late in the day because I work, and they could not reach a manager. They said they would call me back (Lol!). I've heard that one before. At this point I gave up and assumed I would not get anything back. I was just happy to finally get my coins back in correct holders. However, without any indication, I did get a refund on my bank statement for $88. I don't know the cost breakdown exactly, but it seemed fair enough and I was pretty excited. So thanks PCGS!

Here are four of the five coins with proper attribution (I consigned one to auction):
The-1888/7-Snow-1-Indian-Cent
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 07/15/2017  4:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Great update, thanks!
Valued Member
roach's Avatar
United States
364 Posts
 Posted 07/21/2017  12:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add roach to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nice finds! You definitely have to hold the TPG's feet to the fire in these situations. I have had the same type of issue with NGC mutiple times. It's a real hassle trying to send a coin back in and explain your argument over and over again. I'm glad they finally got it straight for you. I myself have a 1925 S Buffalo that I swear is the S/S variety, submitted it as such, but NGC sent it back AU58, no mention of the variety--- a simple no we don't think it is because of "X" is all I ask for. I was thinking of crossing it to PCGS to get the variety on the holder--- I guess I will re-evaluate that idea.
Pillar of the Community
mycrob's Avatar
United States
2602 Posts
 Posted 07/27/2017  3:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mycrob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That is just unbelievable you had to go through all of that hassle with what is supposed to be the top grading company. They should have gotten it right the first time.

If a customer sends something in with an attribution, they should look at that issue first and if they don't have the expertise, send the coin to someone with the expertise (like Snow!) to make the proper call.

We pay good money for these certifications and they should be done right the first time. Not after 3 tries and months of hassle and headache.
Pillar of the Community
Heymikep's Avatar
United States
824 Posts
 Posted 07/27/2017  5:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Heymikep to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Mike 1487, I currently have two coins with PCGS for the same issue but for 1847/46 Seated Liberty half dollars. They gave it a regular 1847 with no attribution even though I submitted and paid for it. I have sent them both back and have been working with a manager and he thinks that with the info I submitted with the coins and discussing with the graders that they will change it to the correct designation. Unfortunately it is taking quite a looong time. I think that they only have 1 attibutor for all coins because they are not doing a good job at all. Good luck!
  Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 5,939Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.29 seconds to rattle this change. Forums